Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims

[TinselKoala]

Ainslie must be getting exhausted from moving goalposts and willfully ignoring and misrepresenting what's being discussed. Poor old thing is really grasping at straws now. Apparently my last demonstration wasn't comprehensive enough.... I "accidentally" left out a test or two that I probably should have included. But then I would have missed this opportunity to demonstrate Ainslie's foolishness AGAIN!

But really, we know she's not capable of grasping the implications of what's in these videos, but GMeast surely is.

She must really enjoy being put down, time and time again.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PKF1r6vwUpI


Yes, Ainslie, Great Scientist, you are proven to be utterly and foolishly wrong YET AGAIN, because I have shown just what you, and your faithful steed GMEast, have repeatedly denied: the capacitance of the IRFPG50 mosfet acts like any other capacitor of 2800pF and passes AC current just fine, without damage, at any "polarity" and between any of its terminals.

HEY AINSLIE.... THE "TRICK" as you put it has nothing to do with this Little demonstration. This is just another Little item, one of many, where you are shown to be over your head, swimming against the current, utterly and completely wrong. No, the Data you need to provide is the data that supports your claim in the last paragraph of your Adden-dumb. More heat -- more power dissipation at the load than is delivered by the battery.... temperature RATE of rise data like you insist on but have NEVER shown. You need to refute all the negative data I've published, with some valid data of your own that supports your bogus claims. But we know you cannot, and that is why all your protestations, all your squawkings and parroting of terms you don't understand, your goalpost-moving .... all come to nought.

And why are you lying so transparently about what you said and what issue I addressed? HERE IS WHAT YOU SAID, ROSEMARY AINSLIE:

But to claim that those IRFPG50's can discharge current from a battery or any supply source through the GATE of a MOSFET?  And then to say that they PROVED this?  For those of you who are NOT purists, trust me on this.  It is IMPOSSIBLE - unless that MOSFET has somehow degraded that it is ENTIRELY defunct.  That's just one of MANY absurdities.  The most of them have been discussed.  I put it to you that IF they're the 'experts' that they pretend - then LET THEM PUBLISH A PAPER ON THESE FINDINGS.  Because, of a truth - there would be a million or more aspiring power and electronic experts who would be MOST intrigued. 

Note that the words "DRAIN LEG" do not appear.

[MarkE]

That was a nice demonstration.

[TinselKoala]

Yes, thanks, overly simplistic I know, but consider my "target audience" : People who make absurd claims about basic electronics and who won't even bother to do their own simple experiments before shooting off their mouths about stuff they don't understand but only parrot.

Ainslie and all her sycophants.... all one or two of them.... would rather talk, bloviate, insult and move goal posts than perform simple and unequivocal experiments to test their claims or demonstrate their validity.

It would take the Ainslie mob four hours to produce a valid data set supporting their claims IF THE CLAIMS WERE TRUE.

Four hours only, as I, working completely alone, have demonstrated MANY TIMES. And they have been incapable of doing it in twelve or fourteen YEARS.

1. Post the CORRECT schematic diagram of the circuit you are using.
2. Post the CORRECT AND COMPLETE operating parameters of the circuit: supply voltages and source, FG or other clock frequency and duty cycle and output voltage settings, etc.
3. Post the CORRECT AND VALID resulting oscilloscope waveforms.
4. Post the Temperature-Time graph of the load heating to THERMAL EQUILIBRIUM using the circuit and parameters specified.
5. Post the Temperature-Time graph of the load heating to thermal equilibrium using the same average power supplied as straight DC from a regulated power supply.
6. Provide a video record to prove you actually did the experiment as you describe, and make your RAW DATA available for inspection.

I've demonstrated, over and over again, how all of this can be accomplished with a minimal budget and acceptable accuracy and precision. Some members of Ainslie's gang are surely competent enough to perform this simple and basic REAL SCIENCE approach to the matter, even though we know Ainslie herself is not. So why, after all these years.... or even after all these months since August 11, 2013 (a day that will go down in infamy for Ainslie).... have they not done so?

I know why.... and so do the rest of "our readers": They cannot, they DARE NOT (tm Ainslie) because they cannot honestly produce any Temperature-Time heating data from their mosfet kludges that beats simple straight Direct Current and direct wiring.


FOUR HOURS, you blowhards. That's all it would take for you to demonstrate the truth of your assertions..... if only they were true. But they aren't.

In effect both the positive and the negative voltages of each oscillation swings, first clockwise and then anti clockwise, through the element resistor and it bypasses the battery entirely. However, there is a small discharge from the battery at each positive cycle that enables enough current discharge to establish a positive voltage through the Source of Q2 to the Gate of Q1. Which then overrides the negative signal that is applied by the switch driver. This ensures that some energy is discharged by the battery, albeit that it is in no way proportionate the amount of energy that is dissipated as heat at the element resistor. Which, in turn results in the dissipation of energy at the element resistor that is far in excess of the amount of energy discharged by the battery supply which in turn, results in the defeat of unity constraints.

What an unsupported, untenable crock of ignorant garbage that "Adden-dumb" is.

[TinselKoala]

Let's consider what Ainslie and her krewe have actually done.

1. Post the CORRECT schematic diagram of the circuit you are using.

Ainslie has posted at least SIX different schematics for the circuits she has claimed to use, and adding the SWeir-deconstructed Grey Box, SEVEN different schematics have been claimed by Ainslie for the Quantum and Q-Array circuits, and her former collaborators have produced even more. EVEN NOW, the two daft manuscripts describing the 5-mosfet circuit have LYING SCHEMATICS in them that were never used before August 11, 2013 and were certainly NOT used to gather the data in the manuscripts. The Quantum Magazine schematic's defects are legendary... yet the schematic and the containing article still persist in their claims. Ainslie DELIBERATELY AND ADMITTEDLY LIED about the actual 5-mosfet schematic and even made Donovan Martin lie for her as well.


2. Post the CORRECT AND COMPLETE operating parameters of the circuit: supply voltages and source, FG or other clock frequency and duty cycle and output voltage settings, etc.

Here Ainslie and her mob has been all over the ballpark. Never once has she posted the open-circuit voltage waveforms from the FG. Never has the actual performance of the circuit been correlated with the operating parameters. No evidence exists that Ainslie has ever even performed a complete trial without fiddling and changing settings! Ainslie famously claimed to Steve Weir that "they got completely different results using the exact same settings" before he showed up to guide them.

3. Post the CORRECT AND VALID resulting oscilloscope waveforms.

This is the most laughable and egregious item. Ainslie has been PROVEN to include falsified data in her reports! The Figure 3 scopeshot, which STILL EXISTS in the daft manuscripts, was not made using the connections claimed by Ainslie, or perhaps was made with an inoperative mosfet, YET WAS INCLUDED ANYWAY, pretending to be valid data, and is the KEY bit of supporting evidence for Ainslie's entire set of claims. Yet it is FABRICATED, the fabrication consisting of her continuing claims of its validity even though she herself cannot reproduce it when she is being watched. Ainslie cannot interpret scope traces herself so the scopeshots she posts are just pretty pictures to her and are definitely NOT displayed in a manner as to convey data.... they are deliberately and ignorantly obfuscatory rather than being good examples of scientific communication. Furthermore she has actively tried to deny, hide and even suppress screenshots from her most recent comedy "demonstrations", because they don't support her ridiculous contentions.

4. Post the Temperature-Time graph of the load heating to THERMAL EQUILIBRIUM using the circuit and parameters specified.

Lately, Ainslie has insisted that the final equilibrium TEMPERATURE of the load isn't adequate to measure power dissipation (even though it is.) So she has begun parroting the word "RATE" and seems to be insisting on RATE of temperature rise as the proper performance parameter to be considered. This is really ironic... because not only is she wrong about that basic assertion, but also SHE HAS NEVER PROVIDED ANY "RATE" of temperature rise data of her own! ALL of her claims in EVERY "paper" she has cobbled together rely on the FINAL TEMPERATURE reached by the load and the time taken to reach this temperature, or the time-temperature RATE curve, is simply ignored.
Furthermore, Ainslie has repeatedly confused, and still obviously confuses, RATES with QUANTITIES, as in her continual buggering and misuse of the terms "Joule" and "Watt".

5. Post the Temperature-Time graph of the load heating to thermal equilibrium using the same average power supplied as straight DC from a regulated power supply.

Recently, Ainslie has claimed that her cadre of fumblers has obtained this data. Where is it? Where is the DC calibration data, including RATE of temperature increase, for the load cell she is currently using? How was this data obtained? How are we to be assured that the experimental trials are made with the load cell in the same kind of environmental conditions as the DC calibrations? Up until this past few months, ALL of the Ainslie temperature data is actually invalid, as are the claims of "taking water to boil", because the temperature-monitoring thermocouple was attached directly to the metal of the "element resistor" which in turn was simply dangling in air. Only in the last few months has Ainslie even considered making proper thermal measurements of a properly constructed and monitored load cell IN OIL.

6. Provide a video record to prove you actually did the experiment as you describe, and make your RAW DATA available for inspection.

The video demonstrations that Ainslie has recently provided are insults. Important, long-awaited live video streams _from a cellphone_. A cellphone that actually has to receive calls during the demonstration! A cellphone that cannot seem to be pointed at the items of interest and significance, that does not have the resolution necessary for clarity, that has thumbs placed over the microphone. Narration that is garbled, unclear, disorganized and unrehearsed. Objectives that are clearly not even understood by the presenters. Fumbling illustrations of incompetence in using their basic test equipment. Long delays and even sheer _abandonments_ during the demonstrations due to their lack of understanding of their own equipment.
And the one clear demonstration, from March of 2011.... Ainslie tried to suppress, when it became clear that it is a very definite record of her and Donovan Martin's lies about the schematic and the performance of the device!
Furthermore, Ainslie promised to make her spreadsheet data available; she never has done so. She agreed with Steve Weir and Poynt99 to save and release screenshots from the most recent demonstrations.... she never has done so.

In short, Ainslie and her gang have done _everything possible_ to actually avoid performing a simple experiment or demonstration of their claims!  At every step of the simple process I've outlined above, they have failed due to incompetence, or have deliberately avoided the proper performance.

[MarkE]

You know, I know, everyone including Ms. Ainslie knows that she cannot produce evidence that supports her claims.  The data that you ask of her will never be forthcoming.