Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims

[MarkE]

That's fascinating because  he seems to be saying that he's had a working free energy machine for years, but has kept it to himself.  Then he goes on ot say that he bypassed the body diode of the MOSFET when ... wait for it ... the body diode should not ever forward bias, and he got improved results. 

When the MOSFET turns off, current flowing from the battery positive terminal through the resistor / inductor has formed a magnetic field that will develop an EMF as the circuit is interrupted such that positive convention current will continue to flow in the same clockwise path:  Battery + => resistor / inductor => intermediate circuitry => Battery -.  The EMF causes the voltage at the MOSFET drain to rise: increasing the reverse bias across the body diode.  A diode across the resistor/inductor through a low inductance path relative to the battery - connection such as through a bypass capacitor, or a TVS across the MOSFET source drain can protect the MOSFET.  I think that the likely reason that Ms. Ainslie ended up with the IRFPG50 MOSFET was that she probably blew a bunch of lower voltage MOSFETs.  A fast gate driver applied to the IRFPG50 would blow it as well.  Note TinselKoala's results when he added the two transistor gate buffer to his circuit.  OTS drivers can deliver many times the gate current as that quick and dirty gate driver.

[TinselKoala]

Those folks are living on some other planet.

I think that anyone who claims COP (in the sense we usually use it here, however incorrect it might be), anyone, I say, who claims COP 2 or over should also be required to provide a coherent realistic explanation for why they haven't been able to self loop it. If they can't do that, with data.... then there isn't any point in listening to them any further.

And no, "the dog ate my clipleads" isn't a good enough explanation.

[TinselKoala]

The delusions and lies continue. Note how she completely misrepresents our findings and her own data. Note that she still relies on the utter FABRICATION of the data. Note how "Brian Little" has become "Alain Little" in her fevered fantasies! Just when I thought that the liar Rosemary Ainslie could provide no more amusement, she rises, as if from the dead, with her mouldy old compendium of misrepresentations, mendacities, lies and delusions.

Alain Little ! How does she even find her way to breakfast in the morning, I wonder?

[MarkE]

It is from the other side of the looking glass.  We have been through her data and your excellent experiments many times.  Her own tests performed June and August 2013 showed that her measurements posted in the Paper 1 and Paper 2 were fouled.  Her June 2013 demonstration showed both that they had obtained their Paper 1, Figure 3 oscilloscope readings by connecting their oscilloscope probe to the wrong place, and that the wiring and cement resistor inductance fouled readings even if taken at the correct circuit nodes.

Straight from "Memento" or "Shelter Island" given a reality she does not like, she chooses to feed herself the fantasy that the proven invalid measurements are correct.  Given the reliable measurements taken at the battery of actual battery power draw much greater than thermal energy delivered to her heater load, she concocts a bizarre fantasy that no the heater load is actually generating power that mysteriously circulates without heating the heater.  It is beyond bizarre. 

What is almost equally bizarre is that the some of the very folks who rail here about supposed disinformation and suppression of facts cheer her on without doing anything to straighten her out.  And rather strangely none of them seem to have done anything to apply their skills at repeating her experiments.  Ms. Ainslie says straight out that she is not an experimentalist.  If these folks really believe that she is onto a fabulous untapped energy source, why are they sitting still?  Why haven't they put together the trivial circuits used by Ms. Ainslie to advance across the new frontiers she claims to have discovered?

[TinselKoala]

Exactly. Why haven't they? One reason is that Ainslie's story kept on, and keeps on, changing. What circuit would you use in your attempt? Nobody, _to this day_, knows the actual circuit used by her in ANY of her experimentation, except that performed live on camera under the guidance of Steve Weir. Recall that the original Quantum Magazine article posted a circuit diagram that cannot produce the stated frequency and duty cycle used. Recall that there were FIVE DIFFERENT schematics claimed for the 5-mosfet circuit, and that Ainslie and her thrall Donovan Martin actually LIED about the actual circuit used in the original video demonstration, lying actively about it for nearly a month on this forum, misleading many people who tried to simulate and build that circuit. That demonstration has been covered up by Ainslie but is still available on my YT channel.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neME1s-lEZE

Yet MY work on this project is fully documented in excruciating detail and anyone who wishes to can repeat MY work and they will note that they obtain the same results I present. But nobody, not even Ainslie herself and her team of sycophants, have been able to reproduce her CLAIMS by honestly using the circuits she published, and the only way to reproduce the fabricated data presented in her many-times-over REJECTED manuscripts is to cheat, in the same way that she did, either by not having properly connected test equipment, or simply lying about the circuit's performance, or both.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_w5yaRi25bc

Ainslie's resurrection of this zombie is pseudoscientific misconduct of the worst kind. Not only were her original reports of this cargo-cult kludge of hers full of errors, mendacity, fabricated data and outright lies, she now tries to re-spin the thing with even more misrepresentations and lies.

Go ahead, believers, build and test the circuits, if you can discover what they actually are. Be sure to report your results accurately and honestly.