Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims

[TinselKoala]

The genius troll GMeast writes,

Rosie,

You made a statement a long while back relating to Tinsel Koala's identity and to his cowardice in NOT revealing his true identity. If there is to be any credibility claimed by this turd, then why can't he come forward with his true identity? Otherwise, he remains nothing more than a FICTIONAL CHARACTER to the readers of these threads. It's likened to holding Sherlock Holmes in regard as a REAL SLEUTH. This holds true for the picowatts, poynty-asses, fagluvin, and others that are too cowardly to stand up and show their true identities instead of hiding behind FAKE ones ... unless they are all admitting to being FAKES.

The unnamed academics and others who have supposedly "vetted" Ainslie's claims are anonymous, and NO ONE CAN CHECK THEIR WORK OR VERIFY THE CLAIMS MADE.

I am anonymous to certain people ... but ALL MY WORK IS PUBLIC AND CAN BE CHECKED BY ANYONE WHO LIKES, and not a single thing I've said or demonstrated has been refuted. Especially not by TurdMouth GMEAST.

And there are plenty of people who know exactly who I am, where I live and so on. People I trust, mostly, but also people who have run games on me and tricked me and threatened me. Am I not supposed to be Bryan Little any more?

If you want to call me a FAKE, GMeast.... try refuting something, rather than shitting out your mouth like you do. I don't need "credibility" because all my work is open, replicable and doesn't even require fancy equipment, it just IS.

To all readers that are detractors of these technologies: ARE YOU SO GULLIBLE THAT YOU WOULD TAKE THE WORDS OF FICTIONAL CHARACTERS AS THE FINAL WORD(s) ON O.U.? If so ... then you deserve to REMAIN IN DARKNESS FOREVER ... fueled by BIAS,  BLINDNESS and HATE! You are all a bunch of SHEEP!

Greg

Refute me, Greg. YOU CANNOT. And NOBODY has to take my WORD for anything... because I always provide PROOF, outside references, checkable citations, fully worked math, and demonstrations that are REPLICABLE BY ANYONE. Nobody has to take my WORD for the fact that the NE555N chip in Ainslie's device was made in May of 2007... THE DATE CODE IS ON THE CHIP and you can call STMicro yourselves to confirm it.
Just for one example.
You don't have to take my WORD for the fact that the Quantum 555 timer circuit cannot do what she claims it does... you can simply build it for yourself and check it, or you can watch my very clear demonstrations, or you can look at Mark E.'s scopeshots.

Your argument is, as usual, completely bogus GREG. And as far as making your complete identity known on the internet, go for it, nobody is stopping you. Why not publish your address and phone numbers, so people can call and visit you?

[TinselKoala]

Hey Greggie baby

Suppose for a moment someone on the internet was constantly using foul language, breaking down, saying things to you like "Fuck you dead" and so on. At the same time, insisting that you identify yourself fully.

Suppose I said "FUCK YOU DEAD" to YOU and insulted you with "turd talk" and homophobic slurs. Would you want me to know where you live?

Somehow I doubt it.

[Groundloop]

Open letter to Rosemary Ainslie.

Ref. http://www.energy-shiftingparadigms.com/index.php/topic,2313.msg5059/topicseen.html?PHPSESSID=c1c0992981a38982d550373564ed3ca0#msg5059
Post #435
Snip
"Thankfully - they're back on track - and referencing ME - rather than that RIDICULOUS circuit that Groundloop and our Little Pickle are trying to promote in the hopes of distracting you all."
End snip.

Background:

TK asked for a way to discharge a charged capacitor into a battery. I did respond with three ways to do that.
The first was by using a SCR triggered from a neon bulb. The second was by using glow starters for fluorescent light. The third method was by using a high voltage JT circuit connected to the capacitor and then discharge the
capacitor to the battery by a third coil connected to a diode bridge.

Discussion:

All of my three circuit proposal has nothing to do with your circuits or theories.  All three of my circuit
proposals will work in a setting where you want to discharge a capacitor, that has a voltage higher than
a neon bulb trigger voltage, into a load. I have never, to my best knowledge, published any circuits on the
internet that do not work or as a means of distracting people.

Conclusion:

In you post you use the word "RIDICULOUS" about my circuits. I do not think you are capable of determine
if a circuit is "RIDICULOUS" or not. Your knowledge about electronics is basic at best, and non-existent at
worst.

I expect an apology from you!

Groundloop.

[TinselKoala]

Ainslie is still making her RIDICULOUS claims, even though EVERY TIME she herself or her team have actually TESTED one of their claims... it has been proven to be false. She even now goes back and distorts and misinterprets the findings of her most recent set of "demonstrations" of incompetence: ALL her measurements are bogus, and this nonsense about the battery being disconnected from the circuit _at any time_ is another of her transparent displays of utter ignorance. She and her RIDICULOUS pottymouth sycophant, or maybe psycho-phant, GMeast can't seem to make connected thoughts come together in their minds.

How does a chip with a date code of May 2007 get into a box that was "lost" in 2006 and not "found" until a couple of weeks ago? The box doesn't even contain an IRFPG50 and doesn't operate at anything even close to the frequency range cited in the Quantum article. I'll tell you how that happens: Ainslie's RIDICULOUS pile of lies has become too big for her to keep track of, and the inconsistencies in her story are becoming glaringly obvious to everyone _with a brain_ that examines the evidence.

Let her rant and insult, make claim after RIDICULOUS claim, many of which have ALREADY been proven to be false. Until she manages to DEMONSTRATE THE REALITY OF HER CLAIMS -- which she will never do -- they are just so much verbal excrement.

Groundloop, waiting for an apology from Ainslie for her insults and lies about you is like waiting for a Solstice in July. You'll never get a sincere apology from the Queen of Trolls, you will just get more lies and distortions and false claims without ANY SUPPORTING EVIDENCE whatsoever.

She can't even explain why there is only one pot connected in her Demo Kit 1 box when the Quantum article shows three. She can't explain why there is NO IRFPG50 transistor in there, but instead a very different IRFP450. She can't explain the frequency range of the Box circuit, when it is so much higher frequency than the Quantum article claims. She can't DARE to attempt to explain the presence of the 555 timer chip made in May of 2007. She can't explain _anything_ about "her" circuit, she's an ignorant bloviating fool, and her insults and ridiculous claims mean nothing to anyone, except as easy targets to shoot down.

Her cheerleader GMeast can't even think for himself, with all that excrement and homophobia floating around inside his skull.

[TinselKoala]

Ainslie claims to "know enough" to produce these "oscillations" in the Quantum single mosfet circuit .... but we have NEVER SEEN HER operate her equipment at all. She always has someone else do it!

I tell you right here and now: She does not "know enough" to do anything more than turning the equipment on, if that much. Over the years, she has damaged her Fluke scope, her LeCroy scope, her Function Generator and her battery cables by her incompetent flailings, as well as blowing a bunch of mosfets. She can't do math and refuses to check her work at all, having made many really utterly STUPID errors that betray her ignorance and naivete when it comes to calculations.

If she claims to "know enough" to do anything... let her demonstrate it!

Let her set up a demonstration, operate the equipment and show that her claims can be supported. Of course she cannot do this, the woman is incompetent at everything except manipulating people.

Note her reference to Glen again. She lies when she says he has tried to hide or cover up _anything_. Glen's entire corpus of work is freely available in the excellent collections he has put up for anyone to see. He includes complete raw data, scopeshots, operating parameters, everything. Long videos of running, even. For Ainslie to claim that Glen has hidden or covered up ANYTHING of his work is an absolute lie and an insult to a careful and honest researcher.
Furthermore... we once again see Ainslie's inability to reason. She endorses Glen's "replication" of "oscillations".... when IN FACT, we (.99 in sims and I in hardware) here have made the IDENTICAL WAVEFORMS that Glen has made and that Ainslie endorsed -- and they are not oscillatory waveforms at all in the same sense as the true parasitic feedback oscillations of the "Q-array" miswired mosfet joke. Yet look at what she says about our work. The ignorant bloviating fool even proudly admits to not watching my videos. No wonder she remains so utterly ignorant... she doesn't even know what she is criticizing!