Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims

[minnie]

Hi,
    Ainslie is ignorant, I just looked up the word in my dictionary and she's an exact match.
Mylow was fraudulent which is quite a different thing. Some fraudulent people are achievers
because they go on to the next scam.
  Ignorant people don't get anywhere because they don't listen to others, study the facts
and just go on thinking they know it all.
                                                      John,

[Pirate88179]

TK:

I get it now.  Rose has discovered a path to OU by utilizing the Reality Distortion Field.  I wonder if she can patent this?

Bill

[powercat]

Rosemary has forgotten a very important part of her circuit, one of these needs to be fitted.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6T9w6htMEpY

[TinselKoala]

Lost? Forgotten? Patented? 

[TinselKoala]

Well, here it is almost the end of September and Ainslie still has produced absolutely no evidence for any of her claims. Perhaps she thinks the trail of confusion she has laid down will distract from the FACT that her claims are bogus and have no evidence whatsoever to support them.

Nor will she commit herself to endorsing any waveforms as being the "correct" ones to produce the effects she claims. How very convenient! She can't show any evidence of her own claims, no waveforms that "work", but she is sure that anyone NOT producing her claimed effect is therefore using the wrong waveform.

But wait.... in the IEEE and IET submissions, which according to Ainslie were checked and reproduced by Donovan Martin Himself, the waveforms are specified. They are GLEN's waveforms, shown in the links to Glen's work above, and reproduced by Poynt99 in simulation and by ME in hardware, using the circuit that GLEN used at the operating parameters that GLEN discovered and that Ainslie endorsed. But of course, now that people are once again ready to examine those claims, and have the Demo Kit 1 box _actual schematic_, thanks again to a third party Steve Weir, no thanks to Ainslie, she rejects Glen's work and the waveforms she formerly endorsed. And of course she does this without providing any evidence, any waveforms of her "own".

Whatever, dude. Those of us who _can_, are still _doing_, and are ready to test Ainslie's claims again, whenever she can actually get it together to state what they are: A specified circuit, operating at specified parameters, producing a specified effect. Not some lying conglomeration of delusional fantasy, false schematics, references to fifteen year old "vetting" with no documentation, and broken promises to share data.

In the image below, you can see my current test setup. This uses a NE555N timer in the _exact_ timer circuit that SWeir determined from Ainslie's recent photos of the "lost" apparatus containing the chip made in 2007. I am using the same make and model of "off" time control potentiometer, a 10-turn Spectrol 50k wirewound pot, and I am using the IRFP450 mosfet that ACTUALLY appears in the "Demo Kit 1" box rather than the IRFPG50 that Ainslie has ALWAYS claimed they used. I even found a turn-counting dial for the potentiometer, so that precise settings can be reproduced, just like on Ainslie's Demo Kit 1 box from the garden path... er, shed.

The load is an 11-ohm load made from the nichrome wire ripped out of a blow-dryer. The test board has positions for added inductance in the load side of the mosfet and it has the Gate potentiometer which was apparently not used in Ainslie's box, again in spite of the claims made. I have found that this pot is generally turned all the way to minimum resistance for the effects that I like: good fast cap charging from MY external diode syphon system. You can see the diode, the ultrafast MUR1560, attached to the bottom leg of the load, with the line leading off leftwards to the cap-neon-system to dump the spike power back to the battery (out of view to the left.) The IRFP450 works better: it charges the cap faster, than the IRFPG50 at the same timer settings. I've put a little inductance (the brown thing with the white dot) in series with the Gate leg to simulate the rat's nest inductance in the box. Is this really  necessary? I dunno.

The NE555N timer circuit makes a fixed "on" time that is a short HI pulse, and the potentiometer varies the "off" time, thus varying frequency and duty cycle simultaneously. They cannot be independently controlled by the Demo Kit 1 circuit. I've left in the "Secret of DPDT" on the board, but for this set of demonstrations the switch is in the "Q17" mode, that is, not inverting, since the actual pulse output of the timer circuit does make a short HI duty cycle. Again, in stark contrast to the originally published and still uncorrected Quantum magazine article circuit.