Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims

[TinselKoala]

I sympathise TK. I know how it feels. 

You must be referring to your water power law work from many years ago, because lately, I'd put you pretty strongly in the "claims without evidence" camp, when you aren't actually in the "supporters of claimants who don't provide evidence" camp next door.

[TinselKoala]

I see the whining Ainslie is still trying to insult and denigrate, without actually addressing ANY of the very strong points I've made in my posts or my videos. She also lies about my videos, but after all, by her own admission she doesn't watch them. She is too ignorant to evaluate or even pretend to understand what's going on and she somehow thinks that my demonstrations aren't logical, scientific or organized, or something. What an utter fool she is! I challenge her, ONCE AGAIN, to take any one of my videos and refute it, or tell us just how it's not clear, how it doesn't apply, how it's not scientific. Here, try these ones for example:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_rgB3WlXtU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7i0DziLllc0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3vm2ZTDUyyA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1jENARrROGs

Any questions? Do we think Ainslie might benefit from watching videos like these?

And apparently Ainslie believes there is no such thing as a "mosfet", since she seems to think that capitalization of the acronym is necessary. One can cite literally millions of instances in the literature where the lower-case is used. But since she thinks it's so important... there is no such thing as a MOSFET, either, Ainslie troll: the part is a Metal Oxide Semiconductor Field Effect Transistor, and if I ever see her refer to it as a MOSFET again, without typing it out fully... I will report her to the Grammar Police (again).

Lol. What a story. Ainslie cannot refute a single point that any of us critics have made -- she cannot even verify a Date Code or hazard a reasonable explanation for it -- so she just lies and insults, over and over again. She has neither the eyesight nor the vision to grasp what's right in front of her face.

[TinselKoala]

Compare my video demos to what Ainslie posts as a demonstration, after months of preparation and promises:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q9IRONEArVU

The audio is so bad because the "cameraman" is holding a finger over the cellphone's microphone! How's that for "obfuscation" !!

[markdansie]

I admire rosemary for having a go at a free energy device. However I do not admire her behavior in not accepting the reality she has fallen well short of demonstrating anything that comes close to overunity. The academic world has closed the doors on this and the real problem is the lack of qualifications from an electronics and measurement perspective. I intend to give this no further publicity at conferences or at Revolution_Green.com as it was all over game set and match a few months ago.
Mylow is one of the most famous tricksters claiming a free energy device. TK was among many who early called it what it was which was a fake. He was busted red handed using fishing lines. Many others are now being made accountable through the courts or are serving time like the another South African Mike Brady.
Please do not get all bitter and twisted over this TK as those who criticize you do not count and only have a few of the true believers still following like lost sheep. Anyone with a reasonable amount of electronics or even science experience has long lost interest and quite frankly does not care.
I am called many names, and even a demon by those who try an promote, profit from false free energy claims. Wear the criticisms with a badge of honor, and be proud you are not only true to yourself but speak volumes to the 99% rational population. Its like trying to convert extreme religious factions into believers of another faith. You will never succeed.
I backed of covering Rosemary as she was ill and very few have any faith in her abilities to understand what is really going on. It has been my experience that the poor researchers and the ones that fail only look selectively at data that supports their hypothesis and will not let go even if the smoking gun is staring them in the face
I am sure I will face anotehr public flogging in some irrelevant forums only to further grow my reputation. Just like when Sterling goes of frothing at the mouth about me it just introduces me to a larger audience. So enjoy life and stop bashing your head against the brick wall,. Let Rosemary just fade into the background like the hundreds before her. Let her live in peace with her beliefs and faith.
Kind Regards
Mark 

[TinselKoala]

Here's a little quiz. True, or false? Anyone can participate, but I request that answers be supported with evidence.


1. The Figure 3 scopeshot cannot be reproduced using the schematic and setup claimed by Ainslie and Donovan Martin in the manuscripts posted under their names. Yet the major claims of the manuscripts depend on conclusions drawn from this and similar -- also non-reproducible, invalid -- scopeshots.

2. The Quantum magazine published schematic cannot produce the short ON time duty cycle claimed in the article.

3. The recently found Quantum magazine apparatus contains a 555 timer chip that was manufactured in May of 2007, along with a different part number mosfet,  and other parts not found in the original schematic.

4. The "box" circuit diagrammed by Steve Weir differs substantially and significantly from the Quantum magazine article circuit, both in performance and construction.

5. Ainslie attempted to cover up the "mistake" that led to the "Q-array" of the 4  miswired mosfets, after the release of her first video demonstration in 2009. She lied about the schematic in use and even told .99 that she wished she could have continued the deception longer. Over 400 forum posts here alone discussed the WRONG CIRCUIT, with her conscious knowledge that she was deceiving everyone.

6. Ainslie repeatedly claimed that she "did not post that video", referring to the video of the first demonstration that she posted to one of her four YouTube accounts.

7. Ainslie and her co-conspirator Donovan Martin both claimed that the apparatus was sent off somewhere and never returned.

8. The postings of the two manuscripts on Rossi's blog contain different schematics purporting to describe the same apparatus. In some other versions the schematics agree with each other... but not with the reality of the apparatus as she used it.

9. Neither of those schematics is actually correct, because Ainslie and her crew always used a different location for the Black FG lead than is shown on those schematics.

10. Ainslie's own data show clearly that her batteries do discharge over the course of several days of experimentation, contrary to her claims.


Hint: I have repeatedly posted references and other proofs that show that each of the above statements is TRUE. Can anyone contradict me by proving that any of them are FALSE?