Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims

[alan]

still no answers about this circuit?
guess it's another hoax

[MarkE]

still no answers about this circuit?
guess it's another hoax

Ms. Ainslie has recently spoken out defending several hoaxes.  Is there one in particular that interests you?

[TinselKoala]

I've just received a PM from a new poster called AlaskaStar. I don't quite know what he's talking about, but perhaps he's the person referred to on this page of Ainslie's honeypot forum.

http://www.energy-shiftingparadigms.com/index.php?topic=2313.235;wap2

Rosemary Ainslie says:
Guys - Here's a new one for the books.  A new reach into 'spin'.    You'll recall that 'the boss' was the poster who promised me 'unusual methods' to discredit me.  What actually happened, within a week of threatening this - was my computer was STOLEN during an attack on my premises - a robbery that took place - WHILE I WAS RIGHT HERE.  From under my nose... so to speak.  I believe the attack would have extended to me as well but for the brave intervention of my beautiful dog - LOKI.  Plenty of blood was left as evidence AFTER that attack - and the most of it on my duvet.  It has taught me to pay heed when 'the boss' makes a post.  So.  With this in mind - here's the thing...  In this link...
http://www.overunity.com/13593/rosemary-ainslie-circuit-demonstration-june-29-2013-video-segments/msg364941/#m

he now says this...
For the record, Chris Hunter was daily battling publicly with Ainslie and her circuit claims well over 10 years ago long before anyone here ever heard of her. He was the very first to call her to account, is well aware of her of her fraudulent claims and her mental instability. The guy is a legend as far as Ainslie is concerned and she still bears the scars of those battles. You will no longer find him posting on forums. We stay in touch a couple times a year and his private personal story is remarkable. One of the few people in these forums to run with his original ideas and innovations and bring them to market. Technically, he is as astute as both TinselKoala and Poynt99. ..just a remarkable young man who has no time for this kind of stuff.


Bear in mind that Chris Hunter wrote in Mark Dansie's forum Revolution Green.com wrote to Mark in defense of both my work and Rossi's.  On record - BEFORE that article I have NEVER even heard of Chris Hunter.  I put it to you all - under oath - that ten years ago and to date - I have NEVER spoken nor written to Chris.  And far from saying that he's a 'remarkable young man who has no time for this kind of stuff'... ON THE CONTRARY - clearly he does. 

What is alarming is that 'the boss' claims that 'He was the very first to call her to account, is well aware of her of her fraudulent claims and her mental instability.'  This is COMPLETE HOGWASH.  IF it's true then 'the boss' needs to show proof - FROM CHRIS HIMSELF.  WHERE HAVE WE ENGAGED?  WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE THAT HE HOLDS THIS OPINION?

It is STAGGERING that this level of 'spin' - calumny - lies - can be perpetrated - WITHOUT QUESTION.  And it is BEWILDERING to try and understand how it is that our technology is SO DANGEROUS - that it needs to be NEGATED - and my own skills along with it?  I put it to you that we most CERTAINLY have something that these HORRORS are desperately trying to DENY.  I am the FIRST to claim that our 'proof' is small - our contributions 'negligible' compared to those of Rossi's et al.  But NOW?  NOT SO MUCH.  I am beginning to realise that our technology REALLY REALLY matters.  Why else would they need to lie?  And to lie in every single post that they make?  And to work SO HARD at those lies? It beggars belief.

Kindest regards
Rosie

http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:ArcticTek:Chris_Hunter_%28Alaska_Star%29%27s_Axial_Flux_Motor

Please feel free, AlaskaStar, to join in this public discussion. I'd really like to know the history of you and Ainslie, since "The Boss" has said that you were the first one to "call her to account" many years ago -- yet Ainslie absolutely denies this. It would not be the first time that Ainslie has categorically denied doing something that she clearly has actually done.

As Ainslie quoted above, The Boss said:

For the record, Chris Hunter was daily battling publicly with Ainslie and her circuit claims well over 10 years ago long before anyone here ever heard of her. He was the very first to call her to account, is well aware of her of her fraudulent claims and her mental instability. The guy is a legend as far as Ainslie is concerned and she still bears the scars of those battles. You will no longer find him posting on forums. We stay in touch a couple times a year and his private personal story is remarkable. One of the few people in these forums to run with his original ideas and innovations and bring them to market. Technically, he is as astute as both TinselKoala and Poynt99. ..just a remarkable young man who has no time for this kind of stuff.

[MarkE]

TinselKoala:  Ms. Ainslie is trying to stir the pot again this morning.  Apparently she does not understand your video:  'Electric OU: Tar Baby Cooks Some Turnip Stew: High Heat with "NO CURRENT FLOW"'  Ms. Ainslie speaks as though she is confident that new tests will vindicate her ideas.  Whether Ms. Ainslie believes it or not, I personally encourage her to experiment to her heart's content.  I encourage her to improve her test methods and documentation so that her results are both crisp and certain.  It is through such a process that she may yet learn something about physics and electronics.

Ms. Ainslie is unhappy that you used a DMM to obtain average readings.  She has latched onto information that is only partially correct in order to try and score points on you.  What Ms. Ainslie and a lot of people don't know is how a DMM works, and where it can and cannot reliably extract the DC average of a signal.  What she does know is that a DMM samples.  She assumes that beyond the sample frequency that the DMM cannot obtain reliably extract the average DC voltage.  She is wrong. 

What happens to any sampled system where input energy with content above half the device's sample frequency is that energy aliases.  Aliasing causes problems under certain circumstances.  The circumstances where it causes problems for a modern DMM are narrow.  Signals that are between about half the meter's conversion rate and about 10X the conversion rate result in unstable DC readings.  When the signal changes slowly enough for the meter to track it, the readings will appear chaotic to the human reading the meter.  A typical handheld DMM samples between 2 and 10 times per second.  Signals that are 100X or more the DMM sample rate average well due to the quad slope conversion architecture of DMM A/D converters.  Fluke handheld DMMs that I have tested are perfectly stable reading 50Hz signals.  I believe Poynt99's work inspired Steve to do some tests where Steve went as high as 500MHz.  Steve has some really nice equipment that is good for that.  I have only gone up to a few MHz with my gear.

There are two caveats:  One is that is that the common mode rejection of a DMM front end has an inverse saddle shape.  Somewhere in the mid 100kHz region, the common mode rejection ratio may fall down into the 40dB range, which means the DC signal will bounce around by up to 1%.  At lower frequencies and higher frequencies the rejection is better.  This effect can be more pronounced with cheapy meters.  The other is that meters present pretty substantial capacitive loads.  At frequencies above a few MHz the loading can be significant and a series resistor should be used between the signal source and the DMM.  1K Ohm is usually a good choice.

A fun experiment that anyone with a DMM, a function generator, and an oscilloscope can do is:

Put a BNC T on the function generator.
Connect one BNC patch cable from the T to an oscilloscope channel 1 to monitor the signal output.  Set vertical gain to 500mV/division.  Set 0V to center.  Trigger on channel 1.  Set horizontal sweep to 2ms / div.
Connect another BNC patch cable with a dual banana plug adapter into the DMM.
Set the DMM to read DC volts, 20V scale.
Set the function generator amplitude to zero.
Dial up an offset voltage until the DMM reads 1.000V.
Set the function generator to sine wave output.
Set the function generator amplitude to about 2Vpp
Adjust the function generator frequency to 100Hz.
If the oscilloscope has measurement capability, read average voltage.
Make step adjustments to the function generator operating frequency in 1-2-5 steps, IE 100Hz, 200Hz, 500Hz, 1kHz, 2kHz... 
Adjust the oscilloscope horizontal sweep to keep from 2 to 5 cycles on the screen at each step.
At each step frequency read and record the DMM voltage.  Typically, a decent DMM will remain stable to within a couple of mV until the mid 100kHz range, such as 500kHz.
If the oscilloscope has measurement capability read and record the average voltage reading at each step.
Repeat the process with the offset voltage set to -1.000V.
Repeat the process using a triangle waveform.
Repeat the process using a square waveform.

[TinselKoala]

Ainslie and her "team" will never perform that simple series of DMM tests for themselves, or if they do they will never report the results. Ainslie has a long history of avoiding any tests that have the potential to falsify her claims, and simply failing to report results that don't support her claims, like the results from the laboratory in the USA to which she sent her entire apparatus, a year or so ago.

Not only that, but Ainslie and her "team" have been aware of Poynt99's excellent testing and documentation of DMM accuracy ever since he produced it.

Furthermore, note that in that old video from May of 2012, I clearly am using a MINERAL OIL BATH and I clearly am taking, recording and reporting THERMOMETRIC MEASUREMENTS, properly obtained, of the oil bath system.... and yet the lying, willfully ignorant, mendacious and deluded Ainslie has stated just a few days ago that I have never shown either of those things.

Also note that on the blowup photos that she herself posted to PESN back before the most recent demonstrations.... her FG is set to produce a TRIANGLE or ramp waveform, just as I showed in this video.