Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims

[TinselKoala]

Ms. Ainslie would like a more thorough description of the operation of Q2 in her circuit.  Here is a reference she should read:

http://whites.sdsmt.edu/classes/ee320/notes/320Lecture34.pdf

That's a great reference... for the "restofus". I've downloaded it and added it to the Ainslie database, in the .pdf section.
Unfortunately Ainslie does not have the prerequisites to understand more than the title of the document. By the middle of the first page her eyes have already started to water and glaze over. The rest of the document will wind up on the floor of her birdcage.

[profitis]

i,l see what i can suss out @mark E.not going to be easy though.i wish electromagneto-hunters would use a small finite power source like a watch-battery attatched to a mini-pulse-heater and just drop the whole gamut into an oil bath and read the temperature vs a controll.

[MarkE]

That's a great reference... for the "restofus". I've downloaded it and added it to the Ainslie database, in the .pdf section.
Unfortunately Ainslie does not have the prerequisites to understand more than the title of the document. By the middle of the first page her eyes have already started to water and glaze over. The rest of the document will wind up on the floor of her birdcage.

It does not matter whether or not Ms. Ainslie can understand that document at this moment.  It only matters that the circuit configuration that she has set-up with Q2 is well understood and documented.  The general analysis included in that document has all the elements needed, including the negative bias voltage applied to the source terminal through an impedance, just as from the function generator's offset that Ms. Ainslie and crew dialed up through the internal 50 Ohm impedance of the instrument.

[MarkE]

A simple illustration:

[TinselKoala]

LOL.... that's a good one!

It's particularly encouraging to see that she has reverted to uncritical naive acceptance of the large _artifactual_ amplitudes shown in the Figure 8 scopeshot. This makes shooting her down almost ridiculously easy. These large amplitudes have been shown unequivocally to be due to the large stray inductances caused by her battery wiring and her highly inductive current sense resistors that were used at that time. She used 4, 1 ohm, "concrete" wirewound power resistors in parallel for the CSR at that time.

I've just kluged together a test apparatus with a single Q2 and single Q1 mosfets, with 2, 0.51 ohm concrete wirewound power resistors in parallel for my CSR and overall a lot less stray inductances. I had to add some inductance to the battery interconnect wiring to make the Vbatt oscillations grow to a "reasonable" artifactual value. The results of my testing are in a video that will be ready in a couple of hours, but here are a few stills. I wasn't able to reach quite the extreme values that Ainslie gets in Figure 8, because I just didn't have enough inductances scattered about, but I think I have soundly refuted Ainslie's latest claims and I've met her bogus, cynical "challenge" adequately nevertheless.