Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims

[gmeast]

ERRATUM:
In the last video, I give the part number of the non-inductive resistor I used in the Kelvinish probe as WNER50FE, which is the part number for the 0.5 ohm resistor in that series. The actual part number for the resistor in the probe is WNE1R0FE, the one-ohm unit. Sorry about the confusion, rest assured as the DMM showed the resistor in the unit is indeed one ohm.
I'll be placing an annotation in the video to this effect right away.
Thanks again for pointing this out, MarkE.

And seriously, thank you.

[TinselKoala]

It takes time, materials and knowledge to deal with these sorts of claims.  Poynt99 dealt with some of them, but the message seemed to go right past Ms. Ainslie, as did the messages in your videos.  Greg has posted that he doesn't understand what it is that you were trying to show.  The book cover above has a short list of things that you have demonstrated.

Surely Greg has read Ainslie's pseudosplanations of the circuit's functioning and the hypotheses she has put forth about what will happen when things are disconnected or connected thus and so. Is it possible that he actually _agrees_ with her about those things? If so... that does not bode well for his own research. The issue of whether or not resistors can eat themselves to provide power is one thing, but without proper circuit understanding and a respect for the REAL experimental method, he'll never find out or be able to prove it if he does.  Ainslie made some pretty dramatic predictions there in the past couple of days.... yet my Function Generator still functions, the Tek 2213a still won't display a stored waveform and the Common Gate Oscillator still applies to the Ainslie Q2 half-circuit. The other Q1 half is just a low-side mosfet switch.

So as far as I can see now, the only thing at all unusual about the Ainslie breadboard circuit is that they have the heavy heatsinks and multiple mosfets on the WRONG SIDE. If they had actually used the circuit in the second manuscript on Rossi's site, instead of the one in the first daft manuscript, they would be much better off and likely would not have suffered the mosfet failures that have plagued them.

[TinselKoala]

And seriously, thank you.

You're welcome, and if you also caught the error, thanks back to you as well.

Here's the relevant datasheet if you don't already have it.

[MarkE]

And seriously, thank you.

Greg, would you like to talk about your experiments in comparison to these recent experiments that TinselKoala has performed against Ms. Ainslie's claims?  Some of the things that I think are notable:

The energy gains claimed by Ms. Ainslie have ranged from 5X to 10X and more.  You have shown numbers indicating around 28% gain.  To me that is not good correlation.

TinselKoala's videos and Ms. Ainslie's own demonstrations have shown multiple flaws in Ms. Ainslie's measurements and conclusions:  Ms. Ainslie measured current as the voltage across an uncalibrated and uncompensated inductive wire for the Paper 1 Figures:  3, 6, & 7. 

Even where the oscilloscope probe was placed on the correct DC connection for current sense for parts of the June 29, and August 11 demonstrations, the readings were badly distorted by parasitic inductance.

Ms. Ainslie's contention that most if not all oscillatory current flows through Q1 during the "Q1 Off" phase have been disproven.

Ms. Ainslie's contention that oscillatory current does not flow through the Q2 source terminal during the "Q1 Off" phase have been disproven.

Ms. Ainslie's contention that oscillatory current does not flow through the Q2 gate terminal during the "Q1 Off" phase have been disproven.

Ms. Ainslie's contention that the oscillatory current is in the range of 14App has been disproven.  The actual current has been shown to be about 2App.

Ms. Ainslie's contention that her August 11 demonstration did not show battery current draw at all times that there was heater element current flow have been disproven.

Ms. Ainslie's contention that more power flows in her circuit apparatus than is drawn from the battery has been disproven.

I would like to know your comments on these points.

[gmeast]

I'll post which make and model non-inductive resistors I used in all of my tests as soon as I can find the Mouser invoices. I used two values depending on what I was measuring. I used 0.1Ohm resistors for measuring lower voltage drops like for PWM power determinations and 0.05Ohm for the higher voltage drops like for the Inductive Resistor Heater Element. However, I don't use the Q-Array. My setup is much more basic, but measurement is just as rigorous and requires more than just basic measurement skills (and knowledge)... which (even though you don't believe it) I do have.


Regards,


gme