Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims

[TinselKoala]

Her co-authors. Where are they? How can they allow their good names to be sullied by association with _that_ mass of deluded ranting? How can they allow their names to be included on documents that contain fabricated data, outright lies about the actual experimental conditions and false conclusions based on math errors performed on fake data?  I am flabbergasted. Surely Donovan Martin must know better, or at least be amenable to reasoned arguments. Is this a Monty Python sketch we've wandered into somehow?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fPCN_E5nveQ

I could have done it with three AAs, it works fine with only 4.5 Vgs too. But of course the bulb is a bit dimmer.

[picowatt]

From "her" over "there":

Here's why.  When you cut the MOSFET out of the circuit on that Q2 Array - you've got the probe of the function generator attached ONLY to the SOURCE LEG OF Q2.  It CANNOT SWITCH THE CURRENT FROM THE SOURCE LEG.  IT NEEDS TO BE ATTACHED TO THE GATE.  ANY GATE.  And you've taken the only gate AWAY - out of the picture.  Therefore it CANNOT switch.  DON'T look at the circuit.  LOOK AT YOUR EXPERIMENTAL APPARATUS.  The PROBE of the function generator is NOW ONLY CONNECTED TO THE SOURCE LEG OF Q2. SO. On THIS video - you've either performed a MIRACLE.  Or you you are FABRICATING THE EVIDENCE.  Which is a euphemism for CHEATING.  Not good Little TK.  Not at all. 

No MIRACLE, no FABRICATING THE EVIDENCE, just the very basic operation of a MOSFET configured as a "common gate amplifier"...

For going on three years, many different people have attempted to explain to her how the FG turns on Q2 by applying a negative voltage to the source of Q2, and that when Q2 turns on, the DC current flowing thru Q2 flows thru the FG.

All manner of words and methods attempting to teach her these simple facts have been utilized.  Even discussions at fairy tale levels involving Ms. Gate and Mr. Source were attempted and she still could not comprehend it (check out the locked threads).

All this time, she demonstrated an inability to comprehend what everyone was trying to teach her.  But now, after having watched TK's simple and concise video on the subject, and as evidenced in the quote from her above, she finally demonstrates that she does indeed understand exactly what everyone has been telling her for years, but that she just plain refuses to believe it.  Apparently this is just willful ignorance...     

I recall that way back when, in a locked thread far far away, it took something like three months of discussions involving many people and more videos from TK just to convince her that a FG could pass current.     

Possibly her belief systems would have been more willing to accept TK's recent video had TK flicked a piezo ignitor next to the circuit before he turned on Q2 in his video...

PW

[Farmhand]

Even I can understand how a mosfet could be turned on that way, with a simple explanation. I think she just likes the attention and it gives her something to do.

What I don't get is how on Earth did she originally come up with this circuit all that time ago, all on her own without knowing any electronics ? Was she handed the circuit and told what to do as in make claims and such. How did it originate and who first designed the circuit that she first made claims with ?

In my opinion if a function generator is used the power it draws from the wall should be considered as input, not just what the FG give to the circuit, without the FG drawing power there is no complete circuit. IF she doesn't like that then she should design an efficient circuit to do the driving, like Tinsel did. I say put a Watt meter on the wall socket that the FG is plugged into then add that to the input. 

Cheers

[MarkE]

Even I can understand how a mosfet could be turned on that way, with a simple explanation. I think she just likes the attention and it gives her something to do.

What I don't get is how on Earth did she originally come up with this circuit all that time ago, all on her own without knowing any electronics ? Was she handed the circuit and told what to do as in make claims and such. How did it originate and who first designed the circuit that she first made claims with ?

In my opinion if a function generator is used the power it draws from the wall should be considered as input, not just what the FG give to the circuit, without the FG drawing power there is no complete circuit. IF she doesn't like that then she should design an efficient circuit to do the driving, like Tinsel did. I say put a Watt meter on the wall socket that the FG is plugged into then add that to the input. 

Cheers

The various circuits were not her designs.  She came up with the Zipon idea and was told that she needed to conduct experiments to validate it.  It's been downhill from there.

[The Boss]

I wonder how Ainslie gets PMs if she has been banned here. Perhaps her ban is of a "read only" nature where she can log in and read PMs but cannot post to the threads.

Ainslie had Stefan ban me from this forum 1 day after I joined, and made one single post.
Not only is she able to log in to read PMs, but she is able to reply to them and send new ones while banned from posting.