Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims

[TinselKoala]

Miaow....




(You still haven't left your "thumbs down" indicators on two vital videos in the series, Ainslie. You really need to watch them.)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ilT3LRF0hUA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fPCN_E5nveQ

[TinselKoala]

Those pix are of my test load, getting ready for DC power dissipation temperature calibration. This shows the "low thermal leak rate" LTR arrangement; I also have a way to mount the naked cell in a fan-forced air chamber to create the "high thermal leak rate" HTR arrangement.

I'll be using a webcam system for data logging. I'll have the webcam looking at the constant DC power level (voltage and current on sensitive DMMs) from a heavily capacitor-filtered power supply, and the load temperature thermometer reading, and I'll be taking one frame per suitable time interval, like one minute per frame. I'll repeat the runs with different DC power levels.  The data will then be transcribed into the spreadsheet for graphing. If I can get sixty or ninety data points per power level setting I should be able to state with some precision the power dissipation, given the stable temperature reached by the load cell oil during the experimental trials.

Knowing the thermal mass and the specific heat of the mineral oil, I will also be able to put an accurate number to the actual thermal leak rate of the container, and then I will also be able to determine the _actual_ value, in Joules, of the energy output of the device under test, during the test period.

I may decide to reduce the volume down to 150 mL to make things go a Little faster.

[MarkE]

Those pix are of my test load, getting ready for DC power dissipation temperature calibration. This shows the "low thermal leak rate" LTR arrangement; I also have a way to mount the naked cell in a fan-forced air chamber to create the "high thermal leak rate" HTR arrangement.

I'll be using a webcam system for data logging. I'll have the webcam looking at the constant DC power level (voltage and current on sensitive DMMs) from a heavily capacitor-filtered power supply, and the load temperature thermometer reading, and I'll be taking one frame per suitable time interval, like one minute per frame. I'll repeat the runs with different DC power levels.  The data will then be transcribed into the spreadsheet for graphing. If I can get sixty or ninety data points per power level setting I should be able to state with some precision the power dissipation, given the stable temperature reached by the load cell oil during the experimental trials.

Knowing the thermal mass and the specific heat of the mineral oil, I will also be able to put an accurate number to the actual thermal leak rate of the container, and then I will also be able to determine the _actual_ value, in Joules, of the energy output of the device under test, during the test period.

I may decide to reduce the volume down to 150 mL to make things go a Little faster.

That sounds like something of a plan.  The double containers with radiant barrier in between should have a pretty low leak rate.

[TinselKoala]

I came on here to read science not to hear twiddly twadly nattering and all that bickering ! Also why so many stupid circuits where is the formula for the energy production ? You are all just flapping your wings with no current of anything under you !!! don't tel me about negative feed back rubbish or high voltage high frequencies . Where is the formula And if you don't have one than just ask me !!!!! 

The input should read zero amps zero volts with 10kwh at the out put !! Try that !!

Regards nanobot

Hello, little bitty newbie nanobot. Are you quite sure you are in the right thread? Why don't you trot on over to where the Great Scientists are posting and discussing their "zero amps and zero volts" input readings with lots of "kwh" at the output:

http://www.energy-shiftingparadigms.com/

I can tell you really don't belong here. Here... we are concerned with truth and accuracy, the Scientific Method and actual experimental evidence for claims. You will find that other website much more you your liking, I think. Certainly the intellectual landscape there will be a better fit to your obvious skills and talents, and they certainly could use the "formula" you have offered so kindly to share.

[MarkE]

I came on here to read science not to hear twiddly twadly nattering and all that bickering ! Also why so many stupid circuits where is the formula for the energy production ? You are all just flapping your wings with no current of anything under you !!! don't tel me about negative feed back rubbish or high voltage high frequencies . Where is the formula And if you don't have one than just ask me !!!!! 

The input should read zero amps zero volts with 10kwh at the out put !! Try that !!

Regards nanobot

Nanobot if you think favorably of Ms. Ainslie's claims and would like to discuss them, then by all means do.  Why don't you start by watching the August 11, 2013 demonstration that is on her web site?  That demonstration was intended to show her basic claim of over unity energy production.  See if you find that the experiments she demonstrated August 11, 2013:

1) Agree with: Ms. Ainslie's claims made in Paper 1 and Paper 2
2) Agree with: Ms. Ainslie's decision based on that demonstration to withdraw her Paper 1 and Paper 2
3) Agree with: Ms. Ainslie's subsequent decision to "reinstate" Paper 1 and Paper 2

Use any equations that you feel are appropriate.  Efficiency = Energy_OUT/Energy_IN  might be a good one.