Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims

Started by TinselKoala, August 24, 2013, 02:20:03 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

TinselKoala

Quote from: MarkE on March 12, 2014, 01:47:47 PM
(snip)
I have a couple of ideas:  If your thermal resistance is low enough then you could perform a 100% Q1 on, and 25% Q1 on w/o any Q2 oscillations.  You could run 100% Q2 oscillations.  And you could run 25% Q1 on w/ 75% Q2 oscillations.  If your thermal resistance is too high then you will need to think of something else.

I have a slight problem and that is the power handling capacity of the load resistor stack I am using: 5 ea. 50 Ohm, 12 Watt wirewound hollow tubular ceramic power resistors in parallel, for a measured 10.5 Ohms total resistance and nominal 60 W power handling rating. By immersing in oil I should think that I could go to 100 Watts input without chancing blowing a resistor, maybe.

So with 100 percent Q1 on, and a total circuit resistance of about 13.5 or 14 Ohms, even just four main batteries (48V nominal) would take me well over the 100 Watt power level at the load resistors.

orbut 3000

Quote from: MarkE on March 12, 2014, 09:15:40 PM
If this post is not reprinted on ESP, then it is endorsed.
AND, guys, if it's not reprinted tomorrow, then it is endorsed TWICE. And here's the thing: That's a quite STRONG endorsement. Almost irrefutable. So.


continued

MarkE

Quote from: TinselKoala on March 12, 2014, 10:50:49 PM
I have a slight problem and that is the power handling capacity of the load resistor stack I am using: 5 ea. 50 Ohm, 12 Watt wirewound hollow tubular ceramic power resistors in parallel, for a measured 10.5 Ohms total resistance and nominal 60 W power handling rating. By immersing in oil I should think that I could go to 100 Watts input without chancing blowing a resistor, maybe.

So with 100 percent Q1 on, and a total circuit resistance of about 13.5 or 14 Ohms, even just four main batteries (48V nominal) would take me well over the 100 Watt power level at the load resistors.
It's the maximum temperature that you need to limit.  Typically, resistors top out at 125C heated temperature.

MarkE

Sometimes little reminders are in order:

"The experiments conducted:  June 29, August 10, and August 11 failed to reproduce the results reported here."

"We therefore obtained heat output that was only a fraction of the input power."

"As we are unable to replicate our earlier reported results, we respectfully withdraw this paper in both of its parts."



synchro1

Quote from: MarkE on March 12, 2014, 09:15:40 PM
Official Bill from Big Oil to Rosemary Ainslie.
For lottery tickets not purchased, and storage of suitcase of money not found in Amsterdam, please remit $200,000. via Western Union to:
Dr. Joseph Zimgala
Lagos, Nigeria

If this post is not reprinted on ESP, then it is endorsed.


You finally identified Tinselkoala's Law Firm!