Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims

Started by TinselKoala, August 24, 2013, 02:20:03 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

TinselKoala

Well, this may be some kind of record-setting run of silence. Three, or is it four days now, of peace and quiet, of freedom from insults and mendacities.

If "they" are actually performing any honest testing, they will by now be very frustrated to find that a "negative power product" sitting in boxed numbers on an oscilloscope screen does NOT translate into battery charging, excess heat in a load, or even a lengthening of rundown times. They will have been amazed once again to find that the Figure 3 screen, when honestly obtained, does not produce high heat in the load because the Q1 isn't turning on. They -- some of "them" anyway -- may actually look at my recent videos and find nothing that they can rationally object to.

If there are even any of "them" left, at all, that is.



MarkE

Quote from: TinselKoala on March 28, 2014, 09:32:18 AM
Well, this may be some kind of record-setting run of silence. Three, or is it four days now, of peace and quiet, of freedom from insults and mendacities.

If "they" are actually performing any honest testing, they will by now be very frustrated to find that a "negative power product" sitting in boxed numbers on an oscilloscope screen does NOT translate into battery charging, excess heat in a load, or even a lengthening of rundown times. They will have been amazed once again to find that the Figure 3 screen, when honestly obtained, does not produce high heat in the load because the Q1 isn't turning on. They -- some of "them" anyway -- may actually look at my recent videos and find nothing that they can rationally object to.

If there are even any of "them" left, at all, that is.
Maybe the Ms. Ainslie and her collaborators are learning something.  It's not very likely, but it is possible.

You have proven that Paper 1, Figure 3 cannot be obtained using a circuit configured as shown in Paper 1 Figure 1 with properly functioning components.  As demonstrated June 29, 2013, it can be easily obtained by connecting the Channel 1 oscilloscope probe to the wrong side of the current sense resistors.  And as you have shown it can be obtained with an open Q1.  Given the location of their function generator black lead, the voltage indicated on the oscilloscope Channel 1 during Q2 oscillation periods was not from the function generator, as the function generator was connected around the even the erroneously unmonitored current sense resistor.

MarkE

How does one generate the same amount of heat powering a resistor of value R directly from a battery of some voltage V, and another resistor of the same value R from the same battery voltage V through a PWM, especially if the PWM duty-cycle is in the range of 3.7%?

TinselKoala

Well.... if one is Rosemary Ainslie, it's easy. One just lies about it.


poynt99

I suspect the value of the control R will be increased so that the temperature rise above ambient is the same in both cases.

So in case of the experiment, it might involve short pulses of high current, while the control will be a lower, steady-state current.

Would this be a truly fair comparison? Considering the well-known "vagaries" of battery discharge rates and capacity, no in my opinion.
question everything, double check the facts, THEN decide your path...

Simple Cheap Low Power Oscillators V2.0
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=248
Towards Realizing the TPU V1.4: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=217
Capacitor Energy Transfer Experiments V1.0: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=209