Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims

[TinselKoala]

Yes, all is good now.

@poynt99:

If you are having trouble determining the exact "settings", circuit and waveforms to use in your replication of Rosemary Ainslie's circuit and claims, I would like to direct your attention to Rosemary Ainslie's Blog, "New Light on Dark Energy", where the information you need was posted by Rosemary Ainslie on 21 December 2010.

http://newlightondarkenergy.blogspot.com/2010/12/finally-our-tie-paper.html

This was posted after the "falling out" with FTC, but certainly seems to include a lot of his work.

Of course.... Rosemary Ainslie apparently now disavows those waveforms and settings. Why is the manuscript still up on Rosemary Ainslie's own blog, then?

[poynt99]

TK

Yes, it does make one wonder, doesn't it?

[TinselKoala]

TK

Yes, it does make one wonder, doesn't it?

Not really. She has probably lost the password and can't delete it.

[TinselKoala]

@poynt99:

Still having trouble with finding the "correct" waveforms?

Well, it turns out that FuzzyTomCat himself posted the proper waveforms over on Overunityresearch.com, back in February 2011. I'm sure you've heard of that site!

http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=13.msg10736#msg10736
Reply # 112


I'll also attach FTC's scopeshot below.

[TinselKoala]

I've demonstrated that Ainslie is wrong, many many times. She rants and raves and accuses ME of being "wrong" somehow about the Quantum magazine circuit.... but cannot refute me with facts. The Quantum published circuit does what I say it does, I am not wrong NOW and I was not wrong in JUNE OF 2009 when I first pointed it out.... and nearly TWO THOUSAND forum posts, over two months, it took before AARON finally constructed it and announced that I AM RIGHT. All of this is fully documented in threads that Ainslie has forgotten about:

http://www.energeticforum.com/inductive-resistor/4314-cop-17-heater-rosemary-ainslie-75.html

It is amazingy laughable that Ainslie cannot even see the scopeshot that is UP RIGHT NOW on her forgotten blog.

Remember this, Ainslie?

Remember what AARON had to go through to make a circuit that even came CLOSE to your claim of 3.7 percent ON at 2.4 kHz? And he calls it a "replication?" Of course this was before you savaged him and turned him away from you with your lies, insults and disrespect.

Keep on ranting, Ainslie. I have a record of the past that refutes you, in your own words and deeds.

The circuit that is in your box NOW is not the circuit that was in your box when the Quantum article was written. This is PROVEN by the disconnected potentiometer, the higher frequency of operation of Steve Weir's schematic that CANNOT POSSIBLY give a 2.4  kHz signal, and the SMOKING GUN of the presence of a 555 chip that was manufactured in May of 2007. The circuit in the box NOW was rebuilt in early 2009 so that Donovan Martin could REPRODUCE GLEN's  WORK, so that the IET and IEEE submissions might have some data in them that Fuzzy himself didn't generate. They replicated HIS work, not the other way around !

And of course.... we have the treacherous and lying manner in which you deceived your sycophant GMEAST..... by letting him build and test a circuit with all that history without even telling him it was completely bogus. "Has anyone built it? IT DOESN'T WORK" he exclaimed... and many of us observing laughed out loud and are still laughing at that idiot troll's fumblings about.