Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims

[TinselKoala]

Lest anyone wonder about my statements of June and July 2009 concerning False Triggering and Aliasing of the Fluke scope and the cheap DSOs that Aaron and others were using.... Here is an excellent example showing that even a much more sophisticated instrument can be falsely triggered if it is not properly set.

Here is one of Glen's traces, with the trigger set within the noisy ringing signal of the Current trace... instead of using either the scope's external trigger input looking directly at the signal source itself, or a clean signal like the Drain pulse.

http://www.energeticforum.com/inductive-resistor/5359-mosfet-heating-circuits.html#post84885

This is no criticism of Glen (FuzzyTomCat)... I am grateful to him for publishing these scopeshots and all the rest of his work, which is still openly available for inspection in the true Open Source tradition.

(I make the basic drive signal at about 394 kHz or "thereby". There is no sign of  any kind of aperiodic oscillation, other than the normal inductive ringing and noise in the heavily amplified Current signal. The Drain signal shows that the mosfet is OFF and spiking for about 1/2 of one minor horizontal division and the total cycle duration is around either 6 or 8 minor divisions, alternating in lock-step: meaning that the mosfet is making a duty cycle of CLOSE TO 90 PERCENT ON. Measure the traces yourself, those with eyeballs to see.)

[TinselKoala]

Are you having trouble making your overunity device work? Just can't get the numbers to work out right? Well, maybe you are simply doing it wrong. Here's how to make your device produce OU, every time.
ABSOLUTELY RIGHT.

http://www.energeticforum.com/inductive-resistor/5250-cop-17-heater-rosemary-ainslie-part-2-a-9.html#post88234

[poynt99]

He's an absolute wizard! (or is that 'lizard'  )

[TinselKoala]

In all fairness... Aaron did ask for a check on his low figure, and he showed his working so that his error could be identified... he just asked the very wrongest person he could have asked. A post or two later on, another poster did the calculation properly and explained it, and Aaron demonstrated that he got it and understood, and posted his own correction.

We have never seen anything like that from "witsend" under any alias.

[TinselKoala]

Just a swift Little note here: Rosemary Ainslie, the Red Queen of Trolls, has posted a couple more rants in her honeypot: Now, in addition to making rant-posts savaging me, MileHigh and Poynt99, she goes off on Magluvin and then Pirate!

I'm not going to load up the images of the insane rants here, but rest assured: they are in my database and will be sent off to the appropriate individuals when the time comes. And of course if Mags or Bill want the images they are welcome to them, in case she sobers up and tries to remove them from the record.

One wonders, doesn't one, when and IF Ainslie will ever show any real data or make any kind of substantive work furthering her latest set of claims.
In spite of Donovan Martin's statement, made during the June 29 2013 "demo" fiasco :

The objective behind the (Quantum article -- tk) test was simply not to scrutinize measurements. That's a matter of  opinion always. That's always easy to argue measurements on the scope, from one scope to another, one can argue for days and years to come. Ahm, knowing that, ahm, I think what Rose has been trying to achieve, up to, to now was ah to show some of the waveforms which at times obviously could be very difficult. Because of the simplicity of the circuit, makes it very difficult to obviously achieve (emphasis original) certain fine settings.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cLqM7FRMeZ4


Obviously, what she is trying to ACHIEVE is to insult and denigrate all of her critics so that they will go away, at which point she will start up again with her pestering and her annoying soapsuds "thesis" which is actually a word-salad of delusional conjecture with no contact point with reality.
She has never produced any specific waveforms of her own from this apparatus and has at first enthusiastically endorsed, then repudiated, the waveforms provided by her "replicators"-- easy to do since they all work with circuits different than what she herself claimed to use.