Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims

[poynt99]

I'd like to see a lot less chatter from the Ainslie camp, and a lot more testing. The proof is in the pudding, and all I've seen is promises of pudding for several months now.

When is the Ainslie camp going to get off their keisters and whip up some of that pudding they keep teasing us about? Talk is cheap, and it simply doesn't cut it when outrageous claims are involved.

Maybe they just need a little cheering-on; all together now:

"Go go Ainslie camp
Get to testing
Save the rant"

[TinselKoala]

There is no testing to talk about!

Remember the June and August demonstrations? They went into those, cold. But for the "private" session before the more public August demo, there weren't even any rehearsals! Remember how, in the June 29 demo, they didn't seem to understand what the problem was, and how they were surprised by the Q1 oscillations, to the point of suspecting their FG of malfing? None of them had operated that apparatus for a long, -long- time, and they certainly didn't understand the problem space.

And of course, for over a year prior to that, Ainslie claimed testing was happening, that the Figure 3 scopeshot was trivial to make, and all the rest of it. For how long has she been promising battery draw-down data? Since 2009, at least. Yet they were caught completely by surprise on June 29, and again on August 10.

Now she is making her claims without producing any supporting data at all. She has apparently learned one lesson from her farcical performances: if you don't give out any data or details, you cannot be solidly refuted.

Where are the scopeshots that Steve Weir had them save to the USB stick, and that _AINSLIE AGREED TO PUBLISH_ ? Nobody has seen them, and Ainslie has given several lame excuses, like "Donny has them and Ainslie doesn't want to bother him"..... right.  The TRUTH is that those scopeshots, along with the conditions under which they were made, are powerful coffin nails, that demonstrate to those with the wits to understand them, that Ainslie's claims are utterly false. And Ainslie knows this! This is why she will not publish them, not some lame excuse involving Donovan Martin's busy schedule.

The entire history of the Ainslie affair demonstrates that getting data from Ainslie is like pulling teeth.... from an old woman, who has lost all her _real_ teeth long ago.  Where are the alleged reports from all those engineers and companies? She cannot provide them because they don't exist.

[MarkE]

TinselKoala, awhile back I asked Steve if he knew anything about the flash drive captures from the June 29 demo.  He said that they were not available.  He did not elaborate.

[TinselKoala]

Mark E., that's right, they are "not available" ... from the Ainslie camp.

Several possible reasons we can imagine. On the one hand we have several different kinds of incompetence: They lost the flash drive, the dog ate it, the scope wasn't set properly to make the recording, etc. etc. On the other hand we have several different kinds of duplicity: They don't want to publish them because they realize what they show, they are in Donny's hands and Ainslie doesn't want to bother him, etc. etc. Can anyone think of other kinds of reasons why we don't have those shots? The fact remains that they were to be published, by the agreement made and discussed ... and they have not been published.

By the Ainslie mob, that is. I went through the video and made screenshots of the scope screens at the times of the USB saves. The descriptions of the conditions of each shot can be easily heard in the video -- as can be Steve Weir's words telling them to publish the shots, and their words agreeing to do so.

(Of course as we all know this is not the first time (nor will it be the last) that we have been promised raw data by Ainslie ... and she has failed to provide it. Where, for example, are the spreadsheets that she promised to Stefan and the rest of us, years ago? Of course those are moot since it has been amply shown that the data from all those early experiments cannot be trusted at all.)



Now.... we really should be asking a bit more pointedly, I think.... WHY have the Ainslie mob not released their clear versions of these scopeshots, since we have the screen grabs of them already and we can tell, with sufficient detail, just what they do show because of MY work?

(The compendium of most of Ainslie's posted and "published" scopeshots, no thanks to Ainslie:
http://seani.justemail.net/rosemary_ainslie/
And below I've posted an image of what she had to say about that compendium. Every one of the shots was indeed posted to the internet, publicly, by Ainslie herself, as anyone (except, apparently Ainslie) can verify for themselves. )

[TinselKoala]

By the way.... I have told Ainslie, long ago, that I can indeed provide the source (her posting) of each and every one of those shots, and I've asked for her to specify any one that she challenges. She has never responded to that, instead choosing to continue to emit statements like that above: paranoid, delusional accusations that are simply impossible in fact, and which are easily refuted by simply entering into "google" the filename or SCRN sequence number of the shots.