44 Times More Power Output than Input

[TinselKoala]

I was wondering that too. Cook, Cox, Dean, those fellows have been around a long time in the inertial propulsion zone.

[MileHigh]

I am thinking right now that it might be the case that the big coil's oscillating field might be rotating the _motors_ instead of the magnets.

I agree.  The motors themselves also look like magnets with some asymmetry that get turned by the big pulsing coil right underneath.  The 10-ohm resistors complete the circuits for the motor coils and allow them to react to the changing magnetic field.  So some people (the experimenters?) got faked out by that.

There are no torsion fields at play here in an exotic sense, just conventional torque causing conventional motor action.  Although a turning rotor is a "solid body under torsion stress."

MileHigh

[Liberty]

Is this the same Jeff Cook? Selling a 'reactionless drive toy'...?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SLJDQwHnItA

The display model simply allows a magnet to become magnetically locked in attraction on both sides of a ring magnet, then by the input of additional force to overcome the magnetic lock, forcing the magnet beyond the attraction lock, enters the repel field on the far side of the ring and moving magnet to launch away from the ring magnet with a repel force.  I don't see a potential for real gain in this magnetic configuration, because the attract force of the magnets must be overcome with a similar input of force.  It is like trying to get more force out by applying force to a repel field of a magnet, and expecting to get more out from the spring action of the repel field.  This repel action does not yield more usable output.


Liberty

[tinman]

@TK
This is why i am going to build the device as specified in the paper,as i to cant see how the disc magnets can turn those motors. A test has already been carried out by a very gifted man on another forum,in reguards to the electromagnetic field of the coil being the sorce of power that is turning the small motors. Even at high power levels,and an open circuit on the motor(generator)only 30mV were achieved-and absolutly no rotation when the two leads were shorted.
Also we must concider that the small motors them self have two reasonably strong magnets right next to the rotor,wich would just about kill any field sent by the inductor powering the system.

Here is a paragraph from the test carried out at the NPA 19 conference
Quote: This was evident and presented at the NPA 19 conference and
is indisputable, showing that by increasing it beyond 60 Hz the power input was so
small that the magnets were unable to even rotate any longer; thus, it was decreasing
with frequency.

The best performance is reached with a frequency of between 45 and 50 Hz.
The device pictured above,is the actual test device-and it dose run as stated.
How-i dont know-yet.

[tim123]

He's selling a reactionless-drive-toy - that you operate - while holding it down with your hand. Thus making it impossible to observe any such reactionless behaviour. It's a non-sequitur. I smell fish.