Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Is SMOT an example of overunity??

Started by Latch, September 23, 2013, 03:30:02 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

elecar

Hi LibreEnergia.


happyfunball said  "A SMOT is no different than picking up a steel ball and dropping it. No OU at all."

Low-Q  said   "The steelball in a SMOT is moving by natural causes. It is not over unity, and will never be."


You said "A SMOT that could self loop would be overunity. "

I agree with that 100%

You also said  "However no one has ever produced one that can and theory predicts that they cannot."

I disagree because I have produced a self looping "SMOT" however that is the name generally used by people on the FR forums and is not the name I have given mine.

You also said "There is no arrangement of permanent magnets alone that can give rise to an excess energy over a closed cycle."

As above I have done it, and the very fact that it self loops and uses nothing but permanent magnets and gravity means it must be OU when factoring in friction and other losses.

Just look at the comments from happyfunball and LowQ above, a self looping smot is not overunity ? Perhaps they would like to explain what it is then.

I know whats coming and it is why I have been loathe to openly say it on the forums because the next expectation is for me to prove it.
In good time I will but unlike many here I am not here to give my work away for "the common good"
The next thing I will be accused of being a scam artist and what ever else people think will get me to display it. But in order to be a scam artist you have to be asking people for something. And I am NOT asking anyone for anything.
When I have protected my work I promise you I shall reveal it here first.





happyfunball

Quote from: elecar on September 26, 2013, 06:19:00 PM
Hi LibreEnergia.


happyfunball said  "A SMOT is no different than picking up a steel ball and dropping it. No OU at all."

Low-Q  said   "The steelball in a SMOT is moving by natural causes. It is not over unity, and will never be."


You said "A SMOT that could self loop would be overunity. "

I agree with that 100%

You also said  "However no one has ever produced one that can and theory predicts that they cannot."

I disagree because I have produced a self looping "SMOT" however that is the name generally used by people on the FR forums and is not the name I have given mine.

You also said "There is no arrangement of permanent magnets alone that can give rise to an excess energy over a closed cycle."

As above I have done it, and the very fact that it self loops and uses nothing but permanent magnets and gravity means it must be OU when factoring in friction and other losses.

Just look at the comments from happyfunball and LowQ above, a self looping smot is not overunity ? Perhaps they would like to explain what it is then.

I know whats coming and it is why I have been loathe to openly say it on the forums because the next expectation is for me to prove it.
In good time I will but unlike many here I am not here to give my work away for "the common good"
The next thing I will be accused of being a scam artist and what ever else people think will get me to display it. But in order to be a scam artist you have to be asking people for something. And I am NOT asking anyone for anything.
When I have protected my work I promise you I shall reveal it here first.

Until you have 'protected your work' and can show it, I will assume you are blatantly lying.

elecar

Hi happyfunball, that is your prerogative. Perhaps though you can explain how a self looping "SMOT" is not overunity.

happyfunball

Quote from: elecar on September 26, 2013, 07:09:14 PM
Hi happyfunball, that is your prerogative. Perhaps though you can explain how a self looping "SMOT" is not overunity.

I didn't claim a looped SMOT wouldn't be overunity.

I stated that a SMOT is not overunity, and therefore cannot be looped.

But of course yours does, though we'll never actually see it.

Magluvin

I found this interesting. If the ball being released is not a magnet, and hopefully the ball exiting is not a magnet, what would keep this from being able to go back and forth, if set up to do so? Other than the magnet getting beat up. ;D

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CoHGGZfERE0

http://www.teachersource.com/product/magnetic-accelerator/electricity-magnetism

Mags