Building a self looping "SMOT"

[elecar]

I believe this is a fraud in the making.

'elecar' make have discovered a way to loop a SMOT a few times by giving the ball some gravitational potential energy to start with , but it will stop once friction bleeds that excess away. Interestingly this would probably work better without the magnet in place.

His description of on-going self-looping is pure fantasy in my opinion.

Post a video of it working or withdraw your claim. You have nothing to loose as your patent application is sufficient IP protection already, if it works.

Wow I have learned to expect this type of reply from jumped up know it alls like TK and Conrad, but I had always given you more credit Libre. So now I have to treat you with the same disdain as those two idiots.

So in order for anything to be real, us mere mortals must bend and bow before you and the other 2 ass wipes before it could possibly be  real ? You must be shown or it is a fraud ? please direct me to the forum rule that states that to be correct.


Here is the truth, You, TK and Conrad have nothing to show, not 1 of you 3 "experts" have ever bought anything to the table. I believe that what actually eats you 3 up is the thought that someone might actually do something that turns your little worlds upside down.

I have always treated you respectfully, I only expect the same. You decided to act like the other cretins and so that is how I shall treat you from now on.

[norman6538]

Enough of this stupid bickering.

I  learned that when someone says something bad about you it says more about who that person is than who you are.


Norman

[elecar]

A video showing the self loop in action over a reasonable period of time, would seem an obvious way to provide evidence for the claim.

Hi Powercat, respectfully you state the obvious, I mean if your give me this coming Saturdays 6 winning lotto numbers I will win the lotto !!

I stated right off the bat I would not be disclosing my working prototype, I am in the middle of doing a deal with someone who may be prepared to pay me for my design. Is it really that hard for people to understand ? Should my word that was given to that person be made worthless, just so I can prove to some random strangers that I am telling the truth ?

I state again clearly on record here, I will NOT be showing my unit to ANYONE until I am done with the business I am conducting.
If anyone only want to see my unit working, is it so hard to understand what I wrote in the opening post of this thread "please come back later"
But no, post after post of "show it"

[elecar]

I think it depends on positioning of magnetic track with respect to ball.   If magnet is positioned on one side,  then it will attract the ball and ball will stick to the magnet.

If magnet is kept vertically above the ball then magnetic force will be balanced by  weight of the ball hence ball will not jump and stick to the magnet.  You have to select ( or adjust) magnet and ball in such a way that magnetic force pulling the ball upwards is exactly equal to weight of the ball acting downwards making the ball  " weightless".  ( I mean magnetic force is neutralised by gravity force).

This is same as sun's gravitational pull is neutralised by earth's centrifugal force making earth's motion perpetual.  If centrifugal force is less than the gravitational pull,  then earth will simply fall into the sun.

Hi Newton, sorry but you are wrong. If you make sure that the magnets are positioned correctly it matters not that they are on one side.

[elecar]

I have the impression that most of the people who claimed the impossible in this forum (or in other OU-forums) did not know what caused the effect they observed.

And I always observed that the inventors only had one working prototyp.

The obvious thing to try for an inventor is to reproduce his own invention. And during reproduction one could find out which parts are essential and which parts can be replaced by known alternative solutions.

So, the way to go for our SMOT-Wunderkind would be to build two more working SMOTS. This can not be that expensive.

An even better way would be to disclose everything in order to have more people experimentimng and observing. Of course this raises the age old question of how to make money without patents and all that capitalistic crap.

Greetings, Conrad

CONrad,
I was already doing what you have just stated Constipated one. I decided that since I am not going to disclose my unit yet, I would try and reproduce the effect using a different design.




To all those that have managed to remain respectful.

There are few Ideas in the thread and I think some of them are workable, but I decided to go with Normans design. I chose Normans design for 2 reasons (1) It looked easy to replicate from easy to find parts. (2) He has always been respectful and genuinely seems to be trying to replicate the effect.

To that end, here is Normans track as he posted a couple of pages back. Credit for the track goes to Norman.

Using Normans design I will try to recreate the effect, I shall show my results succeed or fail with pictures and video, I can not say fairer than that,