Building a self looping "SMOT"

[elecar]

no no @elecar.markdansie didnt attak ainslie,in fact he gave her airtime on his website.gave her plenty space to show her stuff too.i would strongly suggest you giv hm a shout if you want a solid stamp of varification.if your smotball can make at least 3 circles then youve made history mate.

Hi profitis, you will note that immediately you made this post TK sprang to life posting several times. Let me try and get you to understand why he did that.
He knows that he was the one who started the bad feeling, it was actually on that RA thread which by the way was moved from where it was originally so I had to track it down.

Now please take a look at the thread  here   http://www.overunity.com/13538/rosemary-ainslie-circuit-demonstration-june-1-2013/135/#.UnqqVdisrDc

After you have read it come back and at least do me the courtesy of saying that your post was made in error.

Are these not Mark Dansies own words ?

The best thing you can do with Rosemary is ignore her.

If its any comfort I have upset her and she is not very happy with me.

In reality telling Rosemary's story allowed many others to express their view like Magnetic man etc outside of of forum. I really struggled as I feel people like this should perhaps not be given publicity, but there again the stage is set for a demonstration. i just want a conclusion.
Have you ever heard the term give them enough rope

Tk you do not have to convince me, I clearly stated that her claims were against my belief system, I agree with you, Mark E , Milehigh etc. However there has been an event where its going to be tested, and that should be the end of it.
I and many others have been banned from expressing our views on sites like Free Energy News, which really sucs, and I believe people should have the right to express their view (politely).

Politely, haha joke of the day ?

Then take a look at the posts numbered
481
483
489

Note how respectful I was when replying to someone on the thread.
Then note how TK was rude and disrespectful for no reason at all, also note that his minions over there are the same ones over here with their noses browned from having them stuck up his ass. Note also how they waited for him to come and start his crap on this thread before they grew the testicles to chime in with their own disrespect.

So you see Profitis I stick by my stance that Dansie was one of TKs sidekick minions being disrespectful to an elderly lady.

Now you are free to believe what you want but I have furnished you with the evidence. (Better hurry and check it out before TK edits it)

TK is a rude moron, the evidence he asked for in one of his previous posts can be found at the link I have provided.

[powercat]

I take it the Mark Dansie you talk of is the same one who joined TK in his attacks on the elderly lady ?  And I would give him a scoop for his website ? Yeah ok step away from the crack pipe powercat.

You seem to be determined to find excuses about providing proof and now verification, your latest one makes me laugh in over 10 years that "Rosemary the little fragile whiter than white elderly lady" that you talk about has been claiming over unity, no one has successfully replicated her claim nor has she had it verified by anyone credible,  she has been shown to be a liar and not just by TK, are you implying that elderly people are incapable of deception ?  or are you suggesting we should just take people at their word without evidence for verification ?

And before you answer by saying TK was bullying and harassing, that was definitely a two way street and Rosemary is well known for attacking anyone that disagreed with her claims, you only have to read the numerous threads to know that.

Your comment about me and a crack pipe is just the sort of thing that Rosemary would say if you questioned her, it would appear you're taking the same approach, let's hope yours is not a fraudulent claim like hers was.

I have just seen your above post Reply 555 and you are taking things out of context and twisting reality, the Rosemary saga was over 10 years and you have to read lots of threads to understand how deceitful she is and that she was the one attacking people first if they had any doubts about her capabilities.

Rosemary will not be making any comment in this thread as she is banned from this forum, she is also banned from other forms as she is the one that causes all the trouble not TK.

[elecar]

Elecar,

I thought that the magnet was supposed to come up from the right side of your video,, like the last motion it makes,, and it looks like if the tube were not in the way it would at least of made it back to the gate area.

I understood your design to have the ramp in the middle be the exit ramp but in your video you release the ball down the other ramp.

Hi Webby, if you have followed the thread and read it you will know that the track in the tests was the one Norman designed. I have explained that Normans design did not allow for the ball to climb and then roll back and exit as he made the track "teardrop" meet at a point with no extension  of the ramp side track as in my design.
I made it clear I would not be showing mine yet but was happy to help others if I was able. And thats how I came to be working a track presented by another forum member. I believe the effect can be used with several different track designs. I have managed to get Normans track to loop 23 times, I did not get that on video but I have video of Normans track looping a dozen or so times.
I am now working on a design that uses an acrylic track. I shall post details of that here in the coming days/weeks as and when I have time.

[elecar]

Quote powercat

are you implying that elderly people are incapable of deception ?

No I am not implying that, in fact to be clear I know TK is a master of electronics, I had very little doubt he was correct. But that does not mean RA was being deceptive (intentionally)

or are you suggesting we should just take people at their word without evidence for verification ?

No you should not take anyones word, you should expect evidence. But it does not have to be on your time table and it does not have to be asked for in a disrespectful manner does it ?
Look at my own opening post I explained in the clearest way possible that I would not be showing my unit yet and if that is all you wanted to see to come back later.
But look at the responses, liar, con artist, scam. fraud. And I suppose I should just take that ? like I have said before I am always respectful to people, try and find one person I have been rude to who never started out by being rude or disrespectful to me.
I am not weak like TKs minions I do what I want and I think for myself.

There I answered your questions now I have some for you, what do you think of TKs rudeness and disrespect he showed me in that thread ? Was I ever rude or disrespectful to him ? Should I just sit back and take his rudeness ?

[TinselKoala]

Ainslie lied many times, as I and others have documented over and over. Not only that, she actually FALSIFIED DATA and placed it into manuscripts that she tried to get published. Not only that, even after her falsifications were soundly exposed in her own attempts at demonstrations, she still has not withdrawn the copies of the "papers" that contain the falsifications. Her statement of "retraction" is really no such thing; she still makes her false claims without providing any real experimental support.

I don't care one whit what her gender is, how old she is or how "white" she is. She is a proven, many times over liar, and she has committed the cardinal sin of deliberately falsifying data and has even attempted to get that false data published.

Here you can see for yourself the falsified data, in her "official publication" still up on Rossi's vanity blog: (Specifically the Figure 3 scopeshot)
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/files/Experimental%20Evidence%20of%20a%20Breach%20of%20Unity.pdf
And her admission that the data is falsified:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1s9z620SFbA
And here is a clip showing that she even gets other people to lie for her:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cLqM7FRMeZ4


But none of that has anything to do with my analysis of elecar's videos, does it?

How and why is my analysis of elecar's video not correct? How does elecar's video show anything new or different that SMOT builders have not already seen many times? How does elecar's video support his claims?

Elecar has now had many opportunities to deal with these issues, but it is so much easier to insult and denigrate me. I don't think there is anyone on this forum who has been more insulted than I have been, by various claimants (none of whom could prove their claims either) so elecar's little droppings don't disturb me at all. Let him prove his claims! He cannot.