Building a self looping "SMOT"

[ramset]

Tk
Here I have yours
Sorry I forgot to give it back

---------------------------
So what do you know about Steve Ward?
thx
Chet
PS
I don't see Rocks in your "year 0002 fuels we know of chart" either {thorium].?

[Hopeful1]

Quote LibreEnergia: I don't doubt that there are untapped energy sources waiting to be found.

Great!  agrees with JouleSeeker and seems like just about everyone else on the forum.

I agree too! 
Hope y'all don't mind if I jump in.

To me, its like Newton playing with a few pebbles on the seaside.  Playing and thereby learning.  Sure, why not?
Play is not a waste of time and may lead to something.

I say, play on...  and keep your eyes open.  enjoy the journey.  why not?

[tinman]

Water doesn't seem to be mentioned, except in the context of hydroelectric generation. And of course the fuel that gets the water behind the dam in the first place for that is the sun's nuclear reactions.

You forgot gravity-to go along with the sun.If there was no gravity,your water would never fall behind the dam wall.

Quote TK: I never said magnetism and gravity are fully understood. What I said, if you actually read and think about my post, is that we understand them _pretty darn well_ and and I will say further that we use them in ways that utterly refute your false assumptions. Read up on the Cassini mission!

And that comment wasnt aimed at you.

Quote TK: This makes no sense to me. Go ahead and put a rock in a bucket, sitting on the ground. Now, show me it doing some work, powering something. Go ahead, it's simple enough according to you. I really really want to see this.

I guess you missed my post to MH.

[powercat]

32 pages and still no actual evidence of a successful self looping SMOT, what we do have is the usual skeptics and believers confrontations, why can't the believers ever understand that the only evidence that counts is an actual working device, but they seem to prefer pages and pages of argument with no working evidence.

Before all the believers jump down my throat, I'm not saying it can never work, but why are you saying it can work and yet are incapable of showing it working.  Wouldn't it be more productive to say I believe it might work and I want to research and experiments and hope one day to produced a self looping working device, but I think that would be too easy as most of the believers seemed to enjoy the confrontation of words and blind faith, rather than civilized communication with fellow members.

[TinselKoala]

Tk
Here I have yours
Sorry I forgot to give it back

---------------------------
So what do you know about Steve Ward?
thx
Chet

Do you mean the Steve Ward that is listed on this page? Who wants to change the curriculum in schools so that they teach his confused garbage?
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Electromagnetic
lol
It's hard to see what advantage he has, considering all the other electromagnetic free energy and overunity devices and theories that work.

Oh... wait... none of those things actually _do_ work, do they.

PS
I don't see Rocks in your "year 0002 fuels we know of chart" either {thorium].?

My chart? I think maybe you have me confused with someone else. 

Sure, thorium rocks and other kinds of radioactive or chemically reactive "rocks" can provide energy. And I'm sure you can trace the real origin of this energy back to its ultimate source.

But what does that have to do with gravitational PE and rocks in a bucket creating work?


By the way.... one very strong sign of "woo" is when the theory or device is self-named by the claimant. Steve Ward, "wardforce".... YGTBKM.