Are rotoverters really viable?

[Photonfanatic]

I searched google and read a few of the articles. I watched some of the youtube videos. I could never satisfy myself, that what I was seeing was really an overunity device. So I'll just ask here. Are rotoverters the real deal? I know that by and large, they're still in development. But if anyone can speak to their validity, it would be the people of this forum.

[Photonfanatic]

Hellooooooooo is anyone there??

[Neo-X]

I dont know either if it was an ou but i do believe that ou exist.

[baroutologos]

despite their great para-philology by Perez and his likes, not a single rotoverter has been reported as plain OU ready fro work.

[conradelektro]

I searched google and read a few of the articles. I watched some of the youtube videos. I could never satisfy myself, that what I was seeing was really an overunity device. So I'll just ask here. Are rotoverters the real deal? I know that by and large, they're still in development. But if anyone can speak to their validity, it would be the people of this forum.

To state it very briefly: nobody has ever shown a true OU device.

There are claims of having an OU-device every now and then, but OU has never been proven conclusively. So, do not buy one.

But think, if you had an OU device, would you give it away for free? Therefore it is more likely that good OU-candidates are kept a secret. (Personally I do not believe in hidden OU devices, but some people think there are OU devices which are kept secret. But if they are well kept secrets we will never know.)

In this forum people discuss interesting circuits, devices and set ups, which COULD be OU. But of course, it is very difficult and may be impossible to make these ideas work.

Nevertheless, many of the discussed circuits, devices and set ups are interesting. May be not interesting for everybody, but interesting for people who like strange and unknown things.

But there is no proven and finished OU device!

Greetings, Conrad