M Drive reactionless drive invented by me

[ingyenenergiagep]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JsAFpVP2vsU

This machine works.

[M Drive Inventor]

Ingyen> I'm aware of the LPU and I know there's another thread just 2 posts below this one on the forum.

Please guys, this thread is about the M Drive, and people reading it expect to read about it.

[conradelektro]

Please guys, this thread is about the M Drive, and people reading it expect to read about it.

@M Drive:

You can not disclose the fine details of your machine because you want a patent (as I gather from some hints you have given). So, if we can not know how it exactly works, what can we discuss? We can only give you general pointers to known science as you give us only general hints to the workings of your contraption.

(Remark: I do not want the details of your machine, I just want to say that there is nothing to discuss without details because thousands of details have already been tried without success. So, it is only the fine details which could be new and interesting.)

Your videos do not prove that you have a reactionless drive, sorry. Even the slightest friction can give you the impression that it does. Your video does not show anything exceptional. Thousands of such machines with the same overall look like yours have been built.

Because we can not discuss details, people show you what has been done before to make you aware of the thousands of errors inventors have done in this field. But you seem to know everything there is. So, again, nothing to discuss.

You want to hear that we believe from your videos that you have a reactionless drive? Come on, what do you expect from people with an IQ of at least 70?

I do not say that you lie, I say that you have not provided sufficient information to allow a meaningful discussion or to draw a meaningful conclusion.

But even if you provided all there is to know about your invention, only a very good carefully controlled and reviewed experiment could provide proof. Moving a machine along a track is a bad experiment. A pendulum would be better, but the constant deviation of the pendulum must be great to draw any quick conclusion.

Yes, we admire your workmanship, yes, you may doubt any law of physics you want, but what then? Yes, you want to talk about your thing, fine, what else?

Do you want to find investors? This might not be the right forum. You want fans, become a rock star.

Greetings, Conrad

[conradelektro]

The right part of turning mass.

@ingyen: I know it sounds bad, but I have been there and I have tried hundreds of speed up and down profils and also exactly what you are proposing.

I know, it does not help that I say this, because I could have done it wrong and you could may be do it better. And almost nobody wants to listen to advice. So, do it, but I advise against it, for very good reasons and because of experiments I did (but I am not the brightest person there is).

My opinion about a reactionless drive:

- It is not possible in the ordinary world we live in, definitely not by throwing around weigths (unless you throw the weights away for good).

- It might be possible at the quantum level near absolute zero degrees or near the speed of light, but this can not be carried over to the macro world.

- It might be possible during the forming of an universe in the first seconds where many laws do not yet apply. But we have passed that moment 13 Milliard years ago.

- It might be possible at the level of galaxies because of dark mater or dark energy, but you will not be able to do this experiment in our solar system, it is much too small.

Greetings, Conrad

P.S.: This post is on topic!

[hdeasy]

As  ijust posted as well on the youtube video, Just slip and stick - no mechincal thing like that will do it. I know - check out mine: Seems to accelerate: CIMG4183.AVI Even to weigh less when point up: CIMG0154.AVI .
But it was proved to be just slip and stick for movement and the scales were faulty. Easy to make a mistake.