Reactive power - Reactive Generator research from GotoLuc - discussion thread

[Farmhand]

My Pleasure Luc, I love to experiment.  With my particular setup I made the toroid more for a transformer ( a motor would be better with the core higher than it is from inside to outside diameter) and with a circuit I can get similar effect by switching the thick (primary windings for a step up), but the timing is odd and requires a 4 Phase signal, two phases can do it using resonance I guess. I'll make a few changes and probably mount the new rotor on a shaft. then I can couple to different motors ect.

Cheers

[dieter]

Luc and all others,


Has there been any attempt to design a controller that would:


test the power factor and trigger some relais to connect the right amount of capacitance to get a 90° phase shift (eg. like an autofocus), and probably stepup the voltage simultanously to maintain the initial or required voltage?


A circuit that can indicate the power factor in a simple way would be useful anyway. How are wattmeters doing that?


With 10 caps and relais, with values of 1,2,4,8,16,32,64,128,256,512 uF the controller could handle anything between 1 and 1023 uF.


Regards


BTW. your research is some of the best I've seen in the field of FE, so respect and thank you!

[jbignes5]

Keep going Farmhand you are now playing in my world. GREAT work there.


One suggestion though. Get rid of the magnets and wind up the two phase coils on the rotor. What this will do is bring variability to the generator which will adjust to the field coils. You can still use the magnets as a magneto like setup and mount them on the shaft to energize 4 coils of the magneto section to power the field coils. What this does is remove the power input requirements after the system is brought up to speed.


Remember the Tesla patent I have been showing about this system. Try to stay on that course because it does work exactly how it is shown. All of the connections are shown as well to where to pull current from once the system is running.


This thing uses the transformer action to loop the magnetic field and electric field. Since both are tied together it guides one (magnetic) through the machine and converts it to the electric (inductive) action of the transformer. This will only be as good as the magnetic pathway you have designed into the field cores and rotor. More pathway there and the stronger the output will be.


You are sooooooooo close now.


Have fun,
jbignes5

[gotoluc]

Hi everyone,

I have an interesting effect (to me anyways) in a Solid State generator of my design that I've been working on part time for the past couple of months.

Could .99, TK or MH confirm if this has value. Since I recall .99 said that until I have a positive means when current prob is inverted my circuit would be using power.
Well I now have a positive means with current probe inverted and the generator circuit is outputting power to a resistive load (GE 53 12v 2w bulb).

Video has some corrections: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bz5AlbQHILI

Luc

[poynt99]

Luc,

I believe those are 18 Ohm resistors (8 is grey if I recall), so you likely have 18 of them in parallel.

Once again, a drawn out circuit can reveal things we may miss when thinking about the circuit strictly in our heads. I have taken the liberty to drawn one for you.

First thing of note, is your metal mass of MOT's etc, is probably just providing a capacitive coupling to ground to complete the smps transformer primary circuit (shown with dotted line to CMM).

Second, you should notice that the FG has a 50 Ohm output resistor RG, and with your measurement probes P1 and P2, you are not strictly measuring the output power of the FG; you are also measuring the output power dissipated in RG. This is going to skew the polarity of your power measurement.

When doing power measurements with your FG as the source, I would suggest you build, buy, or use some kind of low impedance buffer after your FG so that you can measure the true output, not through a 50 Ohm output resistor. Here is a suggested buffer from MarkE.

http://www.overunity.com/13743/rosemary-ainslie-quantum-magazine-circuit-cop-17-claims/msg396139/#msg396139

@Mark, perhaps this is not entirely suitable for this application. Can you suggest something else if not? Actually, now that I think about it, this output buffer is aimed at pulse output boosting, not for sine waves. We would need some biasing in this stage to minimize the cross-over distortion.