Asymmetric Magnetomotive Tugger (shortly: AMT)

[ageofmagnetizm]

Asymmetric Magnetomotive Tugger (shortly: AMT)



Short video of testing of magnetomotive behaviors of
prototype at:   http://youtu.be/RfwOWbvO9GU




"Above is drawing where green vectors indicates direction of
magnetomotive forces measured along plane of interaction
of magnetomotive train build of three AMTs. Near placed
magnetic fields integrate and vectors of forces..."



I have disclosed the conceptual designs of AMTs at:
https://sites.google.com/site/ageofmagnetizm/home/magnetomechanics/magnetorefractive/geomagnetic/magnetomachanical/asymmetric-magnetomotive-tuggers


Now everybody can read about it, make own experiments and discussing it here on the OVERUNITY.         
Taras Leskiv - the inventor of Asymmetric Magnetomotive Tuggers.

[ageofmagnetizm]

Design of Asymmetric Magnetomotive Tuggers allows building of count-parallel Magnetomotive Trains and autonomous Magnetomotive Fields Propulsion Systems.



Attached here picture shows section of Magnetomotive Fields Propulsion System where Magnets continuously producing magnetic flux which is
continuously absorbing, conducting and re-emitting by Ferromagnetic Conducting Loops having its walls covered by Dia-magnetic Deflecting Lattices which continuously incline flux so that vectors of magnetomotive forces along Lattices become parallel to each others and un-perpendicular to outer walls of Propulsion System.

[TinselKoala]

Too bad it doesn't work. Your video shows it returning only the energy you have stored in the "magnetic spring" by your "cocking" of the device with your hand.

You have invented yet another "SMOT" that gives back only the energy you put into it. Your field line drawings are wrong, and there is no net propulsive force around the loop.

If you look at my work with the Simple NON Overunity Toy called "HappyFunBall" you will see how you can determine the kinetic energy of your rotor and whether or not any of your magnet arrangements are helping or hurting your performance. But for your device it is even simpler than SNOT.
Take away all the "stator magnets" from your device, and spin the rotor, whose mass you know, to a measured RPM using some external power source. This will allow you to know the Kinetic Energy of the spinning rotor. Time the time it takes for the rotor to come to a stop once you remove the driving power. Now you can calculate the _power dissipation_  of the baseline, rotor-only configuration. Then you can put your stator magnets back in place. Now spin the rotor up to the same RPM as before and start your timer. Does it take longer to come to a stop now, or does it come to a stop faster?

Get the idea? If you can show _any_ arrangements of rotor/stator magnets that takes _longer_ to run down from a known RPM than the simple, rotor-only test... then I'd be very interested in seeing it.

[ageofmagnetizm]

Your field line drawings are wrong,



« Reply:   Your field line drawings are wrong...   »


All published by me drawings of geometries of magnetomotive forces - are results of numerous and careful measurements of magnitudes and directions of forces. If you state that my measurements are wrong, than please, place here photo of your measured results of similar magnetomotive structure, or place here a link to explanations of such measurements.


Also I shall learn about your "Toy called "HappyFunBall" to determine your technical level - such considering how to answer to the rest of your statements and suggestions.


Thanks for replay, TinselKoala.

[TinselKoala]

You need to know my "technical level" in order for you to understand and perform the following simple test... which I will wager you have _never done_?

Take away all the "stator magnets" from your device, and spin the rotor, whose mass you know, to a measured RPM using some external power source. This will allow you to know the Kinetic Energy of the spinning rotor. Time the time it takes for the rotor to come to a stop once you remove the driving power. Now you can calculate the _power dissipation_  of the baseline, rotor-only configuration. Then you can put your stator magnets back in place. Now spin the rotor up to the same RPM as before and start your timer. Does it take longer to come to a stop now, or does it come to a stop faster?

Now, please tell my what MY "technical  level" has to do with YOU performing and reporting this simple test.