Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Mathematical Analysis of an Ideal ZED

Started by mondrasek, February 13, 2014, 09:17:30 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 11 Guests are viewing this topic.

TinselKoala

Now we are really getting somewhere! A machine that destroys energy, dissipating fifteen times as much power as you put into it! That would really come in handy for certain applications.

(Check very carefully to make sure you are not dividing by zero somewhere, or rounding to zero in a figure that goes into a calculation involving it as a denominator. Usually the spreadsheet will not permit you to divide by zero, but can you trust it always to do so?)

MarkE

Quote from: webby1 on March 14, 2014, 01:20:44 PM
MarkE,

I have a setup that is over 1500% loss.
B86-B94??
B142-B148??
B150-B151??
What about them?

MarkE

Quote from: TinselKoala on March 14, 2014, 01:26:35 PM
Now we are really getting somewhere! A machine that destroys energy, dissipating fifteen times as much power as you put into it! That would really come in handy for certain applications.

(Check very carefully to make sure you are not dividing by zero somewhere, or rounding to zero in a figure that goes into a calculation involving it as a denominator. Usually the spreadsheet will not permit you to divide by zero, but can you trust it always to do so?)
No, there is no energy destroyed.  The spreadsheet performs a number of comparisons that I think are informative.  For example it compares the percentage energy loss going from State 2 to State 3 versus the energy added in State 2.  That number can easily exceed 100% because of the energy that was stored by the time we got to State 1.  I would be concerned if someone can enter coefficients that result in negative energy at any one of the states. 

Webby is playing with the spreadsheet which is fine.  We'll see if he turns up any new problems that are real or not.

MarkE

Quote from: webby1 on March 14, 2014, 01:56:16 PM
I am getting what I think are non-real numbers, and wanted to make sure that what I am seeing in the spreadsheet is correct,, 264% loss?? with a 42% loss of total stored.

This does not seem real,, and so I was asking to make sure they are.
There are multiple cells that calculate different relative efficiencies.  Each is labelled with what I hoped would be self-evident descriptions.  Do you get any negative absolute energy values in any state?  If you think you have something that is screwed up then just post the spreadsheet with those values in it, preferably with the cells highlighted say using yellow fill or something like that.

minnie




    Webby,
                 think about this, when the "air" in your ZED is substituted with massless, incompressioble
    "air" it becomes solid, i.e. it will behave as if is full of hydraulic fluid.
         It will behave in a completely different manner than with springy air inside.
      Whatever you do with numbers you can't escape the fact that all the crap inside the ZED
     will only hinder the operation of a hydraulic ram.
        That's my way of thinking for what it's worth.
                                     John.