Mathematical Analysis of an Ideal ZED

[MarkE]

The non-fluid fluid graphic cracks me up every time I see it.  Just think: Some fool PE put his name to that.  Someone flunked statics.

[mrwayne]

Don't insult TK,

At least he made a video to see that water seeks its own level.

Which was of course the simple point of that and the next slide lol.

[mrwayne]

I wonder if there was any speaking that accompanied that slide, something along the lines of to push the water up on the right and the air down on the left,, blah blah blah,,,

Oh,, that can not be the case because then the slide would make sense.

Kind of like where the other half of the energy goes when equalizing,, or should I ask, how much energy is needed to be applied to stop the water from just accelerating,, that would not happen to be the missing 1\2,, those darn pesky physics.

Tom,

TK has omitted the next slide every time he posts that slide.

Of course I reminded him several times of his intentional misleading. Still does it.

.....

Free flow and equalization is the same function - only concentrated in a ZED.

That slide began to explain how we reduce the input - which Mark and the others avoid at all cost.

I am glad they keep bringing it up.

[mrwayne]

More lies from the fraud Wayne Travis.  It's all good.  The lies just build the evidence of scienter.  Wayne Travis keeps trying to prop up his central preposterous lie:  That he has found a way to get free energy from lifting and lowering weights.

Mark - It is a joke that you keep trying to uninvent our ZED system...

I think we are on to you. Weights bricks, springs, bollard, ---

Which of those get taller as you compress them???

Diversion of desperation..I understand - it is your job.

[minnie]

mrwayne,
        have you got a 5 hp. self running machine?
               John.