Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Mathematical Analysis of an Ideal ZED

Started by mondrasek, February 13, 2014, 09:17:30 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 11 Guests are viewing this topic.

minnie




   Webby,
            you're still not getting it. Of course all the energy is in the column.
   Just show how you could transfer from one column to another, easy!
      We know if you have two similar columns, one full the other empty,
      open a valve and they will level out at half full.
          Could the GPE be converted and then used to pump by some means.
       How about this idea, imagine a lake feeding a hydro electric generator.
     Take the power generated and use it to pump the water back into the
      lake. I think you ought to be able to beat the 50%!
                      John.
     

mrwayne

LOL - We have insulted you ......................... really.................. omgosh that is so ............ludicrous....
I insult you by saying - you missed it and oh yeah my favorite term" UI" after the behavior of its original owner....

Now compare that to 300 pages of insults, false accusations, and ignorance treatment.......
...................................................

What a pathetic attempt..... by you powercat - once again to twist the truth.
...................................................

First - I am the teacher/inventor, otherwise I am no one important....   
In this class - regarding my invention and machine - you pass or - we painstakingly try to help you understand - the amount of effort has been - sincerely shocking .
And what do we get for our effort to help you ........ twisted fabricated lie after lie and insult after insults.
Let me tell you all I hear from you - 'I don't get it so you must be a fraud' well clue in - the difference is due diligence - many others do, many others - and even people who don't claim to be as almighty as you do.

This is not an insult - it helps to understand our system if you "Check" your preconceived self worth and assumption of a total grasp of the universe - and don't bother blaming me you made the decision to take the direction of assumption......
I tried to tell you - you should consider your insults - you will be embarrassed -- your group only hurts themselves - showing for your lack of ability and character.
..........................
Here is the contrast between you five and the rest of the people we meet::

Yesterday I interviewed an Executive and Professional ME from Chile' (Expansion).
The ME said "I would have never conceived such a process with so many losses, yet together, the amplification is obvious........."I responded - "it takes a certain amount a maturity to get past the false theory that Net energy must come from a creation event, such as Over Unity - our system has never been about a exceeding the ideal output - it has been about the process of five interconnected systems that when used properly together - result in a portion of the ideal available to the consumer.
You are so stuck on ONE of the processes - your conclusions - as clearly explained and warned ---are ridiculously premature..........and incorrect.
Why do other people get it and you don't - it is not because you can't - it is not because they are smarter than you - it is your choice to make incorrect assumptions.
.............................
That made me think of MarkE Lossy lossy lossy lossy ...... yeah? I said that from the beginning??? If your brain stops thinking at the first loss - well - you what do you expect to find?
Of course - several of us have reinforced that it is the process - and a ability to eliminate losses....
I know - Mark you and Kanshi said you can not hook several lossy systems together and improve efficiency ........
Well - do you know what She discovered - layering reduced losses.... you ignored or missed that - TK MH forgot to include that part of her discovery.... you kept repeating it??  - maybe you were trying to convince yourself - of course Larry showed it and you missed it too.
Let me be clear - your fist assertion - has been proven wrong............. I never said that part of the process was magical - but our concentration of layers - certainly reduced costs ---- if you can't admit that......or understand it -review Larry's work.
On a side note:
TK - Do you realized that you  are posting Documents that clearly say confidential and not for copy or distribution on them......and I did not give you permission....no veiled threats here - that is you and marks method. Let me just be very clear to all - TK was not given permission to post Private and Confidential Documents.
...........................................
Back to your topic - You and the  8) 8) 8)  gang have insulted everyone that realized the truth..... - and how funny - now you claim to be insulted.......
TK, MarkE, failed the class -but they get an E for Effort.
Kanshi disappeared - and it may just be coincidental - after she realized that the layered system did reduce cost - but who could miss that - how many times did I say it took 1 cubic foot at the same pressure to create 8000 pounds of buoyancy that normally requires 130  cubic feet.....
If one cubic foot can create the initial conditions that normally require 130 - how can you miss that adding layers reduces cost?????
You remember now - you trashed Tom M over that with your insults................. Really did you miss that - or just more  8) 8) 8) 
Mile H, Minnie, Seamus1234, Powercat, Orbo, and the puppets simply failed the class.
............................
Powercat - do you have the character to apologize when you are wrong......or are you a ... 8) 8) 8) .... who will just slip into another identity and continue to spread slander.
Don't waste my time saying we never showed anything - Don't waste my time saying the process was not explained - if you put 1/10 the effort in to "understanding" that you used to slander......
As far as your" assumed list of lies" - you will eventually wake up and realize - we did not share all our business developments with you -
You should have done your own due diligence.
.................................... Was that mean and insulting........ ??? - you might go read your  8) 8) 8) laden posts and compare..
Wake up 8) 8) 8) dudes...... We tried to help.

minnie




   Wayne,
             that was a huge amount of crap-yet again!
   Have you got a self running 5hp. machine as you suggested you had a while back.
    Just answer yes I have or no I haven't.  Simple!
                 John.

minnie




     Wayne,
              there's nothing I'd like more than for you to prove me wrong.
      Just a simple flow of water will do it. Shouldn't be too hard with 600+%.
       No flow assist though, unless from in the cycle. Good luck!
                  Warmest regards, John.

powercat

Quote from: mrwayne on March 27, 2014, 08:26:15 AM
LOL
Have left Wayne's first word and last, unfortunately the rest of the quote was the usual rhetoric blaming other people and arguing that he has proved how his device works, it's just hidden behind a curtain but he has told you where the curtain is.

help.
You have shown lies and deceit, you keep saying you have shown the evidence, that is the biggest load of BS most members have heard, where is your self running device ?  Where is your verification by Mark Dansie ?  If you want respect you should keep your word and tell the truth, let me remind your delusional deceitful mind that you are a indeed a liar and a fraudster and you are incapable of delivering what you claim.
Pay attention Wayne these are your words of deceit

Quote from: mrwayne on May 28, 2012, 03:20:19 PM
I always keep my word, and I tell the truth even when it hurts
Quote from: mrwayne on May 25, 2012, 04:14:10 PM
I promise, you who wish open sourcing will not be disappointed.
Quote from: mrwayne on June 02, 2012, 06:47:33 AM
We will be releasing to scientific journals and presenting the Data professionally, when Marks Group reccomends.
I look forward to the longevity runs as well, Next weekend is when we have the help to set up the new
plc equipment and software.
Quote from: mrwayne on June 10, 2012, 04:40:37 AM
Mark Dansie has assembled the team for our Extended runs - critical review
Quote from: mrwayne on June 24, 2012, 03:40:11 PM
We will run our pre test runs starting Monday - after we are sure we do not have new clogs
- I call Mark and he will come - the 28 is still our goal.
Quote from: mrwayne on June 27, 2012, 05:16:19 AM
Mark will come as soon as I ask - he is ready too.But I have not asked him to come yet, I might after tommorrows Run.
Quote from: mrwayne on June 30, 2012, 02:27:28 PM
We began running pretrial tests - prior to Mark Dansie's return - I had very much hoped to be done by Wednesday.
Quote from: mrwayne on July 27, 2012, 03:02:09 PM
After this Validation testing and presentation - we will be setting down to a coalition of teams
world wide to bring this technology to the world
Quote from: mrwayne on August 13, 2012, 02:55:02 PM
Mark has set his return for the week of the 20th.
Quote from: mrwayne on August 16, 2012, 03:41:48 PM
We are solving current issues for Mark and the rest of the team's next visit
Quote from: mrwayne on August 25, 2012, 02:32:40 PM
No, I am not sharing run Data with aynone, until we have the system ready to be released
Quote from: mrwayne on August 25, 2012, 10:43:58 PM
Marks third return was delayed because our "new" system would not charge the accumulator
Quote from: markdansie on August 27, 2012, 05:05:15 AM
I still have not seen the two day demo yet , but I never put a time frame on this.
However as with all things as time carries on the confidence level always diminishes.
Quote from: mrwayne on August 29, 2012, 07:14:45 PM
Our OU is not and has not been the question - simple phisics can show it over and over
Quote from: mrwayne on September 28, 2012, 02:42:16 PM
p.s. our optimized system is over 600% efficient.
Quote from: mrwayne on September 28, 2012, 05:11:26 PM
It will all begin in a short time - the validation is just around the corner - I am relieved and excited.
Quote from: mrwayne on October 1 2012 on his web site
We expect to be finished by the end of the week - assuming all goes semi well (parts delivery)
and we will be ready for the Validation!
Quote from: mrwayne on October 15 2012 on his web site
Of course this means we will run a couple days for ourselves before we turn it over to the validation team
- I have been in clear and constant communication with them.
Quote from: mrwayne on October 29 2012 on his web site
I spoke with Mark this morning regarding time lines, and travel arrangements
- we have selected a prevalidation member to come this weekend
Quote from: mrwayne on November 6 2012 on his web site
Do you feel a sense of urgency in our Development?
Have you waited long enough, are you ready to be done with all of the improvements and obstacles,
are you ready for the internal Validation, and the external validation?
Me too.
Quote from: mrwayne on November 11, 2012, 04:07:58 PM
Mark is not a member of the "Final Validation team" - so do not make assumptions - Mark has arranged a completly
independant and extremely qualified Validation team.
Quote from: mrwayne on November 22, 2012, 04:22:19 AM
Yes,And thank you.Mark is a valuable part of our efforts.In Mark and mine's last conversation -
just prior to his heading off on his honeymoon - He has two other stops to make and then we
both hope we are ready for him to return her to Chickasha Oklahoma again. Will we be ready?
Quote from: mrwayne on March 10, 2014, 11:24:14 AM
This is my Final Farewell to O/U.comI am not legally able to show TK my "Suasages" again.It is clear MarkE has only one intention... I did have hope.Wayne
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the many times I have posted this list Wayne has never apologize for misleading people, and obviously he will never do the verification because he's device does not work.  But it all sounded good at that time and probably reeled in a few more investors.
When logic and proportion Have fallen
Go ask Alice When she's ten feet tall