Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Mathematical Analysis of an Ideal ZED

Started by mondrasek, February 13, 2014, 09:17:30 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 13 Guests are viewing this topic.

MarkE

Quote from: webby1 on April 03, 2014, 10:17:55 AM
Show a sreenshot of your calculated volumes for buoyancy,, I did.

I am also trying to show changes in methods that do not reflect in favor of an anomaly,, and yet it is still there.
Screenshots are worthless.  Look at the formulas that are already in the R4 spreadsheet.

MarkE

Quote from: mrwayne on April 03, 2014, 11:15:28 AM
LOL you are such a hoot...and have no character or honor.
So accuses the fraud who has stolen from family and friends with his fraudulent free energy claims.
Quote

First - you have never proven my whole machine does not work as claimed - neither has anyone else...
just because you do not like it or me - is no proof.
Others and I have many times proven that your claims are lies.  Being the shameless liar that you are you simply ignore those proofs and press on with your fraud.
Quote

Ignoring the process to fit your claims is more poor character.

No Anomalys lol ---- so you say...
There are no anomalies in any of your contraptions.  And you cannot show differently.
Quote

Well here is one of the Dozen I have shared - which you ignored:

The ZED has more buoyancy than its total displacement
Archimedes' Paradox is not an anomaly.  It is 2000 year old science.
Quote

It is an open system - and it is buoyancy - or is all your math wrong??
It is Thursday and it is sunny, or are you a wife beater?
Quote

So quiz time - why do you ignore the facts.
I think the completely shameless way you press ahead with your fraud is awesome.    I don't encounter such blatant sociopathy that often.

MarkE

Quote from: mondrasek on April 03, 2014, 11:51:59 AM
Volume of the immersed part vs. the displace volume:  Are they not one and the same?  I guess I am not following what you meant.
Look up Archimedes' Paradox. 

MarkE

Quote from: mondrasek on April 03, 2014, 12:21:51 PM
Sorry John, but that is incorrect.  The volume of any object immersed in water will displace an equal volume of water.

Now the WIEGHT (Mass) of the two can be very different.

But the volume is the same.  That is Archimedes' Principle.

M.
Minnie is correct.  Look up Archimedes' Paradox.

MarkE

Quote from: LarryC on April 03, 2014, 12:26:33 PM

And below is why. The only pure Archimedes shown is the Pod. The Risers are hydraulic pneumatic hybrids using only the accumulated head pressure of the water heads in the surrounding circles.
It is all "pure Archimedes" Larry.  Once again you do not know what you are talking about.  You cannot show anything there that violates Archimedes' Principle.