Mathematical Analysis of an Ideal ZED

[MarkE]

Yep --- You are too smart to apologize for your mistakes.....
Got it.
Well what about the anomalies--- well then? Do you see them now?

So you think pointing out the idiocy of your disciples was a mistake do you "Honest Wayne"?  The mistake seems to be not enlisting more talented disciples.  Oh, that would be your mistake. 

Fraud that you are you keep insisting that the ordinary behaviors in your contraptions are somehow anomalous.  Your contraptions don't do anything out of the ordinary.  You do however shamelessly make false claims of free energy production.  That's OK Wayne.  I am in a particularly good mood this morning.

Viva Las Vegas!

[mrwayne]

More importantly, we all know that you: the fraud Wayne Travis are freely and remorselessly dishonest.  Investment undertaker Wayne Travis: Chickasha's own caretaker of the final resting place for gullible investor funds since 2008.

Are you hoping that will stick without proof - people are smarter than that...their is no double standard here - we proved our anomalies - and you dodge and slander...
stick with the facts - How about that question you keep avoiding - can you admit yet that Larry was right - that the layered system results in a more efficient use of buoyancy?
Don't bother with the but its "lossy or not free energy" that is not the question.
If you do not have enough character to admit one single error - stop wasting all of our time here.
Nothing you say is worth dirt - if you refuse to learn.

[MarkE]

Are you hoping that will stick without proof - people are smarter than that...their is no double standard here - we proved our anomalies - and you dodge and slander...
stick with the facts - How about that question you keep avoiding - can you admit yet that Larry was right - that the layered system results in a more efficient use of buoyancy?
Don't bother with the but its "lossy or not free energy" that is not the question.
If you do not have enough character to admit one single error - stop wasting all of our time here.
Nothing you say is worth dirt - if you refuse to learn.

The fraud Wayne Travis speaks.  There are no anomalies.  Ergo you could not and did not prove any anomalies.  QED.

Efficiency is a term most often associated with energy.  The serpentine does not improve the energy of your useless spring emulator.  It degrades it.

If you want to find those who refuse to learn, just spin up your Rolodex to Tom.   He's having a terrible time with linear superposition.  Yes that's a real term unlike your invented "super conservative" term.

Viva Las Vegas!

[MarkE]

Thank You for posting that Mark,, now you can not say I changed it.

Please notice in state 2 that the OD forces are "-" negative,, this is because riser 2 is pushing both up and down, down on riser 1, and up on riser 3, then riser 3 is both pushing up and down up on nothing but the output and down on riser 2.  riser 1 is pushing up on riser 2 and down on the pod.

Now look in state 3,, those "down" forces from the riser3 and riser 2 are now UP forces,, how can that be when they are still pushing down to move up??

Look at riser 3 in state 3,, it has a negative lift force,, it is only pushing down,, how can that lift riser 2?

In State 1X there is another condition,, and in that one it is the riser wall thickness that is under the pressure to make the lift and that changes things,, look at state 3 Wall Force,, notice that there is at least 1 extra zero after that decimal point,, making the Wall Force very weak and not strong enough to lift riser 3.

Next time any person out there is washing a cup in the sink,, Feel free to experiment

How can it be that water moving in a "U" shaped tube can result in forces changing on both sides of the tube?  Are you really asking such naive questions?

Tom it is really too bad that you cannot manage to learn what we successfully teach millions of teens every year.  It is your choice to keep living in a fantasyland constructed from your special Tom Web physics.  If you are truly mystified by the real physics that describes the behavior of the riser assembly, then go take the problem to an authority whom you trust:  A college physics professor, a high school physics instructor, or a bright 10th grader.

[mrwayne]

The fraud Wayne Travis speaks.  There are no anomalies.  Ergo you could not and did not prove any anomalies.  QED.

Efficiency is a term most often associated with energy.  The serpentine does not improve the energy of your useless spring emulator.  It degrades it.

If you want to find those who refuse to learn, just spin up your Rolodex to Tom.   He's having a terrible time with linear superposition.  Yes that's a real term unlike your invented "super conservative" term.

Viva Las Vegas!

You waste every ones time here - you keep trying to find a loop hole - "force is not energy" give me a break....