Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Mathematical Analysis of an Ideal ZED

Started by mondrasek, February 13, 2014, 09:17:30 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 42 Guests are viewing this topic.

minnie


Marsing

Quote from: MarkE on April 11, 2014, 01:32:58 AM
Should anyone ever discover a means to break the conservative nature of gravity, they would not need new terms to describe what they would have found. We already have appropriate terminology.  What would require explanation are the circumstances under which non conservative behavior can be observed.   So, no there is no: "he of course must throw in newly minted terms".

The fraud: Wayne Travis freely engages in nonsense baffle gab.  An obvious motive is to confuse naive and uneducated audience members.  He presents behaviors that have been well understood and exploited for multiple millennia as things he claims to have discovered.  He's a liar, and not a very good one at that.


If We already have appropriate terminology then We have ever considered that gravity is not always conservative, what we need is only evidence how it can be happen.

but, who are "We"  ?.

MarkE

Quote from: Marsing on April 11, 2014, 04:34:28 AM

If We already have appropriate terminology then We have ever considered that gravity is not always conservative, what we need is only evidence how it can be happen.

but, who are "We"  ?.
We is the scientific community.  We already have the descriptive terms:  conservative and non conservative.  Gravity only became described as conservative once many many efforts to show otherwise failed.  All someone has to do is reliably show that it is in fact not conservative under some set of circumstances and the global characterization of gravity as a conservative field will fall.  Sadly for Wayne and his cadre, they have no such evidence.

minnie




   I think "super conservative" is not quite the term he was intending. Super rather infers
   being even more conservative, perhaps sub conservative would have been a better
   choice?
            John.

MarkE

Quote from: minnie on April 11, 2014, 06:20:50 AM


   I think "super conservative" is not quite the term he was intending. Super rather infers
   being even more conservative, perhaps sub conservative would have been a better
   choice?
            John.
I think Mr. Zed's: "super conservative" is hilarious.