Mathematical Analysis of an Ideal ZED

[Magluvin]

Thanks, Mags,


So insightful, statements like yours help me to deal with the ignorance of those with less system comprehension ability.


Larry

No prob.  Heck, I get tired of trying to shuffle through that crap just to read any substance of a thread. There are many threads here that are beat to a pulp continuously, ALL DAY LONG.

Stefan NEEDS to make private threads for those that request them. Its being done on other forums. Sometimes there just needs to be some isolation from all the negativity in order to get things done. And if at the end of the day, the project doesnt work then so beit. These are the choices WE make to work on projects, only to have to explain ourselves day in and day out. Sick of it.

Anyway, good work you guys. And I hope it pans out for you.

Mags

[Pirate88179]

Exactly.  Let's see a brazen person that's contributing to this thread post a clip of their own working over unity hydraulic bucket brigade unto itself.

I vote for Mark E's brick.  So far, that is showing the most promise.  No investors needed either.

Bill

[mrwayne]

Hey Wayne

Long time since we chatted last.

My post was a bit of sarcasm.    I KNOW that you have not asked for any investments from anyone here. I was just fishing for some clear reasons for the comments.

Webby and Larry and who ever else is doing work on this, its too bad there is more negative posts than they care to be bothered with. I would be very frustrated. Its not like they asked for help from these guys. I guess it just the way things are today. People dont like people doing their own thing and need to occupy their time with page after page of argument. No wonder nothing gets done around here.

I guess Mark was exclaiming that why give away the idea if there is an investor. Wouldnt the investor disapprove?  I cant answer that for him.

Anyway, hope things work out for the builders. its not a simple task.

Mags

Thanks Mag,

Wouldn't the investor Disapprove?

Yes - and every one of my family members  disapprove - because of the way people are treated here - by a few.

I owed it to the builders, inventors and the engineers that helped us since I first posted here.

We are a team.

We are very well protected.

Also, Our intention is to work together with like minded people - I just have to put up with - garbage out's - sometimes.

Again, Thank you.

[MarkE]

No prob.  Heck, I get tired of trying to shuffle through that crap just to read any substance of a thread. There are many threads here that are beat to a pulp continuously, ALL DAY LONG.

Stefan NEEDS to make private threads for those that request them. Its being done on other forums. Sometimes there just needs to be some isolation from all the negativity in order to get things done. And if at the end of the day, the project doesnt work then so beit. These are the choices WE make to work on projects, only to have to explain ourselves day in and day out. Sick of it.

Anyway, good work you guys. And I hope it pans out for you.

Mags

No amount of positive attitude will alter the way that nature works.  When it comes to the acceleration of masses towards one another known as gravity, that behavior is entirely conservative.

Go ahead and put aside the fact that the conservative nature of gravity doomed HER/Zydro's claims the moment they came up with them.  Investigate to your heart's content each of the things they say that they do that they claim are unusual and see how each of those things:  helps, hurts, or has no net effect on efficiency.  Please discuss any mechanism that you think offers a benefit compared to a brick.

[mrwayne]

Wayne Travis math and physics are not on your side.  A series of lossy processes only results in greater loss.  You have yet to identify that non-existent process that makes up for all the losses in your inane contraption and yields the net over unity result.  It's rather obvious why you don't identify it:  No such process exists.

Yes, there is no reason for you to continue in your attempts to mislead people.  Yet you continue to do that.  Why is that Wayne?

MarkE -

I have tried to be respectful even as you spew garbage continually - and I shared a NET Energy System with you.

Maybe looking for overunity limited your math - I never claimed Magical free energy - I accepted that a few puppets could not tell the difference and let it go.

All of our systems Energy input - reuses- and Net can be accounted for properly - that does not require Over unity.

........

Hence the term - Non conservative process.

MarkE I did not want you to miss it, sorry again.

Wayne