Mathematical Analysis of an Ideal ZED

[TinselKoala]

Hey, Honest Wayne Travis.... I have never signed your NDA, and everything I have posted is stuff that YOU YOURSELF or your minions have put onto the internet. I don't have any magical sleuthing skills.... I just have a good memory and I preserve stuff that I think is interesting.

If you don't want some record of your activities to exist for public view.... DON'T POST IT TO THE INTERNET.

Sheesh, Wayne.... grow up.

(And look to your own.... because your Zeds aren't the only things leaking in your little cult.)

[MarkE]

Well I guess playtime is over MarkE,

Are you ready to concede your claim that only 50% of the GPE can be recovered from the column of water.

I am not including the ridiculous add-on that the other 50% is converted into, and then lost as, heat,, that is just silly.

Tom all you have to do is show a mechanism that does as you claim.  Oh, that's right:  You never had such a mechanism.  You have your own specially plead magical Tom Web physics.  I suggest that you do something to go learn real physics.

[MarkE]

...

It's another day so it must be time for a wall of pointless text from the fraud Wayne Travis: claiming that there is still some magic behind the tattered curtain, repeating "The Emperor's New ZED", offering more lies about what people have said, telling more lies about the false free energy claims, and now making veiled legal threats.

Wayne you are a liar and a shameless fraud.  Your free energy claims are silly and false.  You have never been able to substantiate them, nor will you ever be able to do so.  The only question that remains is how you exit.

[MarkE]

I found another use for MarkE's formula.

It appears to predict how much potential I can extract from 2 similar systems interacting with each other when they are charged to 2 different potentials.

In the case where one is charged up to 100% and the other side is at 0% it predicts that I can extract 50% while the charged up side is charging the other side,, and then when they are both at the same 50% potential it also seems to predict that I will have 25% potential left in each side.

That is neat,, that is 50% extracted leaving 2 at 25% so 25+25+50= 100%!

This is not so new however, this is the same strategy that I have been using with my capacitive voltage divider setups that I use to feed alternating pulsed DC to my little motor testbeds for a very long time,, I got that out of a pocket reference guide for electronics.

Gee just a couple of days ago when I offered you some nifty educational capacitor experiments you said you no speaka  da electonica.  Well, now you can go back and perform those experiments and learn something.  Or you can keep spewing your ignorant diatribes.  It's your choice Tom.

[MarkE]

Wrong again MarkE, you do not know what I do, or do not have. Those that I share such information with know of some of the things I have made.

Yeah, right Tom. Sure you have a proof, right behind that curtain. Sure thing.

AAHHHH,, shoot MarkE, all you have is more personal attacks??

Which way does heat energy flow when something is going FROM a higher pressure to a LOWER pressure.

Heat follows a temperature gradient.  Once again you have mixed up physical concepts.

HINT: Heat pumps take the *compressed* medium and allow it to *expand* into the evaporator,, that would be the part inside the room that makes you nice and cold.

You seemed to miss the need for the condenser coils to exchange all the added heat of compression to the environment.

Tall water column,, more pressure,, low water column,,, less pressure

Nursery rhymes?

I wonder what kind of friction heating happens within a line or hose with fluid being moved through it,, I wonder if that friction issue could cause a lot of heating.

Take a class in hydrodynamics and maybe you will learn.

The pic of my balancing levers demonstrates at least a small understanding of applied forces with changing force moments even.

The CVT's that I have made demonstrate at least a small understanding of variable ratios and how to apply them.

So NO MarkE, not ignorance, hands on doing stuff and making things.

No ratio can fix this for you Tom.  The problem is not about leverage.  You present yourself as completely clueless as to what the problem is or what can be done about it.  You just keep repeating the same tired and false claim that you've beat the problem without ever showing any evidence that you have.  If you had a solution then you could show it and given your history of trying to find whatever nit you possibly can to discredit me, if you had something that could discredit me you would surely have shown it a long time ago.

Study the drawing below.  See how the two extremes are offered:  Net force between the columns starts at the complete weight of the filled column, or the net force is barely greater than zero.  Those are the limits that you can arrange with any set of levers, gears, pulleys etc.  Starting with near zero force difference initially loses energy at a smaller rate than with full force, but it still loses energy in the transfer.  By the time the columns hold equal amounts of fluid, it is all over.  Half the energy has been lost and there is no force left to try and drive fluid from the source column to the destination column.