Mathematical Analysis of an Ideal ZED

[mrwayne]

You admit that your system is lossy.  Therefore it cannot on its own deliver any energy such as you falsely claim: "- allowing us to supply endless and abundant clean Energy."

VERY LOSSY, I mean really lossy.... I have said that from the beginning lol....
But since the source of the natural occurring force that drives the differential values between the primary conversion is..... well..... "free" - we have an abundant GAIN.
Here is the limitation you set for yourself - any loss means no free lunch...... well you have to consider what causes head pressure - and how head pressure can be redistributed in a system to understand a ZED....
No magic - just use of available force utilized over a distance 

[mrwayne]

Ok men,
I have some work to do - so lets see if the puppets actual talk about a fact or not....
My bet - 15 posts of insults avoiding any mathematical facts...regarding:
Multiple systems being more efficient
Free flow actual values
Pv in versus PV out of a layered ZED
Force over a distance being a measurable energy..
Or even this silly point - if a system produces Excess energy every stroke  - and matches the Math - what should change? The belief system it is impossible - or the facts...
Good day

[MarkE]

Mark Dansie is a real skeptic -
What do you call yourself - a person who keeps switching names and getting kicked off sites for being a  .

You have me confused with someone else.

..........................
Mark will be invited with honors - just before we release.

There will be only more delays.  You are following the JWK play book.

So keep it up Tk, avoid the facts and make things up - or try to learn from those who do not have an agenda
Or do the usual post three pages of trolling ...
The math is not that hard.

I've done the math and presented it comprehensively.  The "ideal ZED" is fundamentally lossy as you admit the "real ZED" is.  That's the end of the story against your phony free energy claims.

[MarkE]

Pure made up trash - TK - no one on our team of over 200 feels the way you do - they looked and learned...
Spend some time doing that.

Scienter, it's a bad thing Wayne.

[MarkE]

Oh my gosh you are so desperate...
With our system you get 4000 pounds of buoyancy out of a open system five gallon bucket..
Is that a technology you can consider that people might try to support?
Maybe you can't think of a benefit ................

Well, maybe you are not the inventive - but

Levers have been known for thousands of years.  It's hilarious that you claim you've invented something that old.