Mathematical Analysis of an Ideal ZED

[MarkE]

hi mark

It was expected that you would answer with an explanation plus examples, that if one units was converted into any form, others should be convert too, and the result will be just same. and show directly the source of problem.

just hope you will replay to webby with this way if you have found a mistake.
   
still fffff, in exel file pWater uses Kg/m^3 while in qiuz N/liter.

MKS is preferred and it is what the spreadsheet rigorously uses.

[mondrasek]

Yes, there should be a State Y where the pod chamber is empty and the pressure on the pod chamber floor is positive or zero.

MarkE, I don't want to distract from the other conversation(s).  So feel free to ignore for now and come back to this post at any time if it helps to keep things clear.  Or possibly we can start a State Y thread?

Can you see a way to create said State Y without including a system mass value to hold everything in position?  The simplest that I can figure (so far) is to assign a mass value to, say, riser 3, so that the system is neutrally buoyant at State 1 (and would not rise to State1X).  Do you have any other ideas?

[Marsing]

MKS is preferred and it is what the spreadsheet rigorously uses.

I mean the symbols must be different.

[mrwayne]

The fraud Wayne Travis speaks.  You wouldn't know what it means to invent a free energy machine, because you haven't invented one.  You just lie to investors with your false claims of having invented one. 

LOL you are such a hoot...and have no character or honor.

First - you have never proven my whole machine does not work as claimed - neither has anyone else...
just because you do not like it or me - is no proof.

Ignoring the process to fit your claims is more poor character.

No Anomalys lol ---- so you say...

Well here is one of the Dozen I have shared - which you ignored:

The ZED has more buoyancy than its total displacement

It is an open system - and it is buoyancy - or is all your math wrong??

So quiz time - why do you ignore the facts.

[minnie]

    That was crap mrwayne,
                 Archimedes himself reckons that it is the the volume of the immersed part of the object
    which is important, NOT THE DISPLACED VOLUME.
        Try again, better luck next time!
                        John.