Mathematical Analysis of an Ideal ZED

[mrwayne]

It isn't as though the fraud Wayne Travis needs to spend time working on his non-existent technology.  Not having anything to work on leaves him plenty of time to come here and lie about it.

Ok " Chosen One " sorry if asking you to defend your lies is not fun.
...............
OK MarkE, you have had two days
To admit the first anomaly - and you failed.
As is your method - your defended your "paradox claim" - even posted a picture of a buoyant object - void of any layers ........ layers which lay waste to your denial.
..................
You have had one day to admit Anomaly Number Two:
Remember when you claimed it was categorically lossy to add systems together - sorry that you proved yourself wrong in the spread sheets - most people call the learning - but do you have the character to admit that anomaly..

You didn't bother to respond - other than cry baby about me being your fraud 
..............................

Lets go to Anomaly Number Three:
Our system does not consume the pressure * volume used to precharge or stroke - now here is the kicker - while doing work....
Name me another system that produces separate work and conserves the input........ here is a tip - Super conservative might not be in your text book....... the ZED is an anomaly.
Now why can't you suppress the ZED system? ??
I don't think you have "missed it" like you act -- I gave you the benefit while many others wrote you off - You are fooling many..
Have a good day.

[minnie]

  mrwayne,
              it's obvious from your last post that you don't understand Mondrasek's or
   Mark's hard work that they've both put into this analysis.
                  John.

[mrwayne]

He had better hurry up and present something viable, instead of loafing around on Free Energy forums.

He's losing ground fast to Jimmy Kwok. Kwok has multiple experts with PhDs, multiple designs, patent applications, real working prototypes, even pretty girls. Kwok might even have a patent infringement case against Travis, if honest Wayne ever actually tries to sell a "working" Zed to anyone, since Kwok's designs have been around since 2009 or before.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oV5wFTfsTSs

Note the "flow assist" system..... "Reverse Thruster Pressure Equalizer Chamber"....

lol .....
Brilliant ..... James can speak to his inventions - he does have a few clever things - but none of his systems look anything like a ZED .

p.s. don't confuse an Archimedes' limited system to a concentrated form of buoyancy like the ZED - there are thousands of equal volume displacement buoyant systems that are less than 33% efficient.

The difference - we can turn on hundreds of cubic feet worth of displacement with a single cubic foot - no one else can - no one else that I have met has a Super conservative buoyancy system....we are pretty safe legally - thanks.



Take care.
p.s. TK while you are him... I want you to know that every time I share the virtual displacement story - to our growing partners from around the world - I always, always, give you credit for the term.

You may refuse to admit when you are wrong - but I give credit where it is due.
Good day.


Wayne

[MileHigh]

Wayne won't say when he will show a stand-alone working system diving a load.  He ignores the question.  He ignores the question because he never had, does not have now, and never will have a working system.  Perhaps one day James Kwok and Wayne Travis will be using cigarettes as currency.

[MileHigh]

The difference - we can turn on hundreds of cubic feet worth of displacement with a single cubic foot

I guess if you say this to a potential investor and they don't look at you like you are retarded then you know you have a chance at a score.