Mathematical Analysis of an Ideal ZED

[MarkE]

lol .....
Brilliant ..... James can speak to his inventions - he does have a few clever things - but none of his systems look anything like a ZED .

p.s. don't confuse an Archimedes' limited system to a concentrated form of buoyancy like the ZED - there are thousands of equal volume displacement buoyant systems that are less than 33% efficient.

The difference - we can turn on hundreds of cubic feet worth of displacement with a single cubic foot - no one else can - no one else that I have met has a Super conservative buoyancy system....we are pretty safe legally - thanks.



Take care.
p.s. TK while you are him... I want you to know that every time I share the virtual displacement story - to our growing partners from around the world - I always, always, give you credit for the term.

You may refuse to admit when you are wrong - but I give credit where it is due.
Good day.


Wayne

IIRC Kwok already has a fraud conviction under his belt.  I'll have to go check.

[MarkE]

Frown....  You can't even discuss your alleged system using comprehensible terminology that anyone associated with hydraulics and energy production should be able to do.  And you allege that there are anomalies with your system?  The real anomaly is that you are still walking around as a free man.  Count your cigarettes.

No hints!

[minnie]

    Has mrwayne himself been a victim of fraud?
     Any physics prof. would have taken seconds.
     Likewise with the math.
     What about patent lawyers?
                             John.

[MarkE]

Just remembered that I did not post this yet, been a little busy with life

I hope these volumes meet Mark's requirements.

Here is a screenshot and the file.

Congratulations!  You've finally figured how to identify the actual displaced water volumes instead of double counting as you were before.  Now, if you plug in the same values of pWater and G0 instead of your truncated constants you will find that your net up lift forces are identical to the R4 spreadsheet.  IOW there is no algebraic difference in the answer whether one uses pressure applied to each of the horizontal surfaces or one uses the actual displaced water volumes just as you have already been shown.

So, now that you have finally figured out that you really have been using the wrong volumes, and that your numbers match those of the R4 spreadsheet, do you now agree that the R4 spreadsheet is correct?
Do you now see the absolute fact that the Russian Dolls of Ignorance are fundamentally lossy?  Do you finally see that there is no opportunity for free energy in this contraption?

[MarkE]

    Has mrwayne himself been a victim of fraud?
     Any physics prof. would have taken seconds.
     Likewise with the math.
     What about patent lawyers?
                             John.

The false physics claims are 'Honest Wayne Travis' own.  The last thing that Wayne Travis wants around is anyone competent to point out the obvious fact that his contraption does not do what he claims and never can.

Patent lawyers do what they are paid to do:  Usually that is prepare the application in a form generally accepted by the USPTO.  Patent lawyers will be happy to run prior art searches if the inventor pays for that service.  Very few firms review claimed inventions for actual utility.