Mathematical Analysis of an Ideal ZED

[MileHigh]

Wayne:

The ZED STILL HAS ALL ITS INPUT AFTER THE EXTERNAL LOAD IS LIFTED....

Bollocks.  You clearly are not even capable of posing a question or describing a system in comprehensible scientific terms.  You want to pose the question in scientific terms with diagrams that illustrate the problem then you will get an answer.

It makes me think of Webby all proud after posing a similar question to me.  The "catch" was that if a descending bucket is falling under the influence of gravity and also attached to a pulley that lifts another smaller bucket as it falls, then the descending bucket hits the ground with less kinetic energy because some energy was used to lift the smaller bucket.  I clearly explained to Webby that all the energy was accounted for and everything balanced.  I can only guess that Webby was looking for a "victory" and it somehow ties into your "alleged answer to your bizarre and incomprehensible question" quoted above.

So if you want to get out of the Wayne reality distortion zone and pose a question that is actually comprehensible and makes sense and is supported with diagrams and appropriate supplementary information, then I may endeavour to answer it.   However, based on your past history, I am not sure if you are capable.

MileHigh

[MileHigh]

Once the mechanical barrier was broken (past tense for us) to be able to build a machine that harness a process able to generate energy - without fuel, without consuming anything...
The maturity was required to realize that Over unity - was not the only method available to generate Net Energy.
I know you do not get this yet..... because you keep acting superior and insulting good people.
We have a Paradigm shift in the understanding of mechanics----- Mechanical [color=#0081BD !important][/color] does not require Over unity - it requires A Super conservative process.... 
Evaluating it as a Over unity device - is a Pre - paradigm shift Error -
We work as we 'might' to catch you up----- but you are not listening.
You only posture for another self Ego stroke....

You are not listening.  Stop talking in your "Wayne universe" nonsense talk and talk in a coherent scientific way that makes sense.  If you can't do that it is just another giant blazing 20-story-tall Las Vegas sign proclaiming for all to see that you are a complete and total fraud.

Plan B, if this is beyond your capacity. is to show something that works.

MileHigh

[LibreEnergia]

Once again MH......Troll
The math has no opinion, it has no alliances, it has no prejudices, it has no gangs..
Facts are facts......
The ZED STILL HAS ALL ITS INPUT AFTER THE EXTERNAL LOAD IS LIFTED....
Tell me another system that can do that.......................or will you come back with another psych babble analysis instead of the facts.....
You owe us an apology

Thanks.....

One word for this Mr Wayne Travis... Bullshit.

Your maths will prove anything you like if you indulge in modelling the system in a way that does not represent physical reality.

Show us where you are actually powering an external load and then come back and then prove the potential is still retained.  You will not, because if you did your model would be a first law violation and would not represent physical reality as science currently understands it.

By all means present a model of gravity that allows for it to be non-conservative, but expect it to be well scrutinised by those who actually understand the physics.

[mrwayne]

Wayne:

Bollocks.  You clearly are not even capable of posing a question or describing a system in comprehensible scientific terms.  You want to pose the question in scientific terms with diagrams that illustrate the problem then you will get an answer.

It makes me think of Webby all proud after posing a similar question to me.  The "catch" was that if a descending bucket is falling under the influence of gravity and also attached to a pulley that lifts another smaller bucket as it falls, then the descending bucket hits the ground with less kinetic energy because some energy was used to lift the smaller bucket.  I clearly explained to Webby that all the energy was accounted for and everything balanced.  I can only guess that Webby was looking for a "victory" and it somehow ties into your "alleged answer to your bizarre and incomprehensible question" quoted above.

So if you want to get out of the Wayne reality distortion zone and pose a question that is actually comprehensible and makes sense and is supported with diagrams and appropriate supplementary information, then I may endeavour to answer it.   However, based on your past history, I am not sure if you are capable.

MileHigh

You have added something scientific to the discussion?
I must have missed it...

[MileHigh]

You have added something scientific to the discussion?
I must have missed it...

Bullshit.

That's a pathetic attempt at diversion.  The issue is can you or can't you pose a question that actually makes sense in proper scientific terms with accompanying diagrams and supplementary data.