Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Recover energy from gravity

Started by rc4, February 15, 2014, 05:21:41 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

rc4

I tested with a spring, it's easy to sum the energy. First scene without spring, the system lost energy. With a spring the system won energy. A torque is apply to circle, the same torque is apply to stem but moment of inertia are not the same and like energy win/lost is torque by angle of rotation, the system can win energy. I added force on circle because frequency don't must to be high, in this case there are a lot of vibration.

With specific velocity (x,y) the system with 2 arms and an axis give energy. Arms are attrack with gravitational forces.

rc4

Maybe I can use this last technic with this example. The idea is to accelerate an inertial mass with a motor. All energy consume by motor is in mass in rotation. The motor accelerate only rear bottom green pole from magenta pole ant front top green pole from another magenta pole, the rotor has always Fr/-Fr and turn around its axis of rotation and the stator has Fs/-Fs and turn around axis X. Radius r2 > r1 so the torque on stator is not the same. Magenta pole is fixed to stator.

For the stator it's not more difficult to repuls green pole even it rotates in the contrary direction because the rotor rotates perpendiculary to axis X.

rc4

For the last case, angular velocity around axis X can be fixed at w rd/s if an external system (not drawn) recover energy in the same time. No rolling element in the last idea, let rotor change its axis. Or with a rooling element in the center of rotor. With rolling element in the center of the rotor, all forces cancel themselves, at final there are only 2Fr that increase more and more angular velocity of rotor and 2Fs that give torque to external system for recover energy.

3 last images: slope the motor and give forces from magenta to green poles. Fr forces rotates only rotor around its axis and Fs forces rotates around axis red (X).

With a motor parallel to the axis X, with an inertia very high for the rotor, I apply a torque small, small enough for don't change a lot the angular velocity of rotor around its axis. If the angular velocity around axis X is high, the energy win is Torque by angle, but the energy needed is very low.

rc4


rc4

Frequency don't change the final result, even the time to reach 14000 J is the double.