Work from 2 magnets > 19% output 2

[Floor]

File below

[lumen]

That is one hard to comprehend line of thinking.
The angle is not improtant in the results when the data invloves only force over distance.
I had configured my test to avoid any additional conversion of forces by keeping all measurements linear over the same distance. The angle need not even be known.
This allows for easy comparison of work done or required along every movement.

Looking for fault in the angles used is simply looking for a reason to claim failure.
IMO

[Floor]

@lumen

I'm interested in what GOOD critics have to say, because their critical examinations often bring
about new points of view.  I don't have to agree with their conclusions.

LostCauses10X likes to rock the boat.. . Sometimes  boats need a good shaking.
I don't mind it, so long as it doesn't sink the boat, or knock somebody over board.

Please find the attached file circular.PDF

               best wishes
                         floor

[Low-Q]

@lumen

I'm interested in what GOOD critics have to say, because their critical examinations often bring
about new points of view.  I don't have to agree with their conclusions.

LostCauses10X likes to rock the boat.. . Sometimes  boats need a good shaking.
I don't mind it, so long as it doesn't sink the boat, or knock somebody over board.

Please find the attached file circular.PDF

               best wishes
                         floor

I think that your circular configuration would be easier to build, and easier to analyze.
The "stator" magnet must do 4 revolutions for each revolution of the rotor. If you just can find a way to calculate or simulate the energy required to rotate the stator 4 times and simulate the energy provided by the rotor for one revolution. Maxwell 3D can maybe do this?
I imagine that the stator will constantly counterforce as there is no place to "rest", and it is rotating 4 times faster than the rotor. So I am wondering if it is possible to determine in which direction the rotor will go if we look at how much displacement there is involved vs. torque...


Vidar

[Floor]

@Low-Q

Quote from Low-Q "I think that your circular configuration would be easier to build, and easier to analyze." END QUOTE

I disagree on both counts

"Believers " are not particularly useful in science.

It seems to me that seeing some actual evidence that it can work, should precede one's building "IT".

The circular "IT" device is vaguely describe in my PDF file, and exactly timing the two rotations would not be
"easy".

Easy to make a mess of seem most likely.?

                        floor