Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Work from 2 magnets > 19% output 2

Started by Floor, February 17, 2014, 01:53:56 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Floor

@LibreEnergia

Addendum

Quote "So you're prepared to state that your device is OU to 5 signifcant digits but the apparatus is probably 'only half' as accurate as it could be.."
.............
Again, no, I'm not claiming 5 significant digits.  43% of the reason I include 5 digits (Some times a lot more than 5) is to see if, who is responding knows their s__t .  7% is just to stimulate certain anal retentive types, who appear to be in desperate need of taking a S__t .  Then 50% is just to see big beautiful numbers come around to perfect solutions.

In reviewing your above comment, I think I now see more clearly the point you are making. 

The "RO shaft / bearing" sticky characteristic I was describing gives rise to a more conservative outcome in the ratios of work in to work out....

This is to say that the work in to work out ratios would have been more O.U. if the  shaft / bearing" sticky characteristic were reduced.  A larger "R.O return / reset stroke" value,  unfavorably decreases the output value in term of O.U..  The stick characteristic speaks in favor of my O.U. conclusion.

        floor

Floor

I'm in the process of building a new measureing device.  The new unit is
capable of much more precise motions.  It  is built useing  linear and
rotary ball bearings throught.

The new unit is versital and modular so that it can be used to measureing
a wide variety of magnet interactions.

Please see the attached photos.

               floor

gotoluc

Hi Floor,

Very nice build of your test device. Thanks for sharing.

I noticed your topic back in May and glad to see you're continuing the tests and research.

Would it be possible for you to make a video of your test device in operation?  it would help answer so many question.

Thanks for your time

Luc

Floor

Hi Luc

A video of the measuring process would be cumbersome, as the measurement
process is its self...   a long and tedious undertaking.

I have roughly detailed the two magnets interactions during the measurements as an animation.
It is called  "TDanimation 1.PDF".  It is located on the first page of this topic.

I am very willing to answer any questions you have.  Also I would very much so appreciate your
asking those questions, as  the questions and answers may clarify the subject for many others ? 

                 Best wishes
                              floor

gotoluc

Thanks for the reply Floor

I had gone through your pdf documents which btw are professionally prepared. Thanks
I think I've got a good idea of what you're doing, just like to see one or two cycles (motion only) of your new test device.
How much time would it take for 2 cycles (without measurements) to occur? 

Regards

Luc