Akula0083 30 Watt Self Running Generator.

[tysb3]

@ verpies

...and right off the bat you are very ambiguous.

Namely, what resonance frequency are you writing about?:
1) LCR resonance (what C ?)
2) Standing EM wave resonance inside the core (related to its permeability and permittivity)
3) Nuclear Magnetic or Nuclear Acoustic Resonance
4) Electron Spin Resonance
5) Resonance of acoustic standing waves (a.k.a. "dimensional resonance")
    a) transverse
    b) longitudinal


2) tune HF generators coil in resonance on 1/2 or 1/4 or 1/8 frequency transformers core resonance. you need to have 2 resonances at one time. ignorant people don't listen that.

the  ferromagnetic resonance frequency is there:

@ AlI

one more possibility how to find core resonance:

http://realstrannik.ru/media/kunena/attachments/6159/opredelenie_MR.pdf

I'm showing you where is the money. you asking me how they are printed. nobody understand Einsteins theory because it is hoax, but plenty pseudo scientists made money from it. the atomic Bohr model is hoax to. all the experiments was faked.

[NickZ]

   @ MenofFather:
    Thanks for your comments.
    It would be great if someone like yourself could visit Akula, and get some real first hand tuning information, on his current tuning methods.
   I feel that Akula is following the same or similar path to what Dr. Stiffler proposed, By looking for and tuning to that exact resonant "sweet spot",  of whichever type of energy it is.  Usually this requires the use of the spectrum analyzer.
I've not seen a true and exact replication of any of Akula's devices. Nor of his tuning methods, either.

   Verpies:  Yes, we do need to know where to aim our gun, or, we'll miss the target.

[verpies]

nobody understand Einsteins theory because it is hoax, but plenty pseudo scientists made money from it. the atomic Bohr model is hoax to. all the experiments was faked.

Regardless of the validity of Einstein's theory of General Realtivity and Bohr's atomic model you cannot conflate the LCR resonance with the Nuclear Magnetic resonance shown in this experiment or this one or with Acoustic Resonance shown in this experiment or this one or with any of the other types of resonance.

So rather then bashing the legacy science, directly answer the question which one is it?

[tysb3]

@ verpies


You have repeatedly been shown:

http://realstrannik.ru/media/kunena/attachments/6159/opredelenie_MR.pdf

Excerpt: "Причем количество витков не влияет на резонанс."

translate: "Moreover, the number of turns does not affect resonance."

[verpies]

You have repeatedly been shown:
http://realstrannik.ru/media/kunena/attachments/6159/opredelenie_MR.pdf

You cannot assume that a member of an English forum will understand the nuances of a technical text written in Russian.
I have not been shown anything meaningful to me and you still have not answered my question directly.