Reactive Generator Research for everyone to share

[gotoluc]

To all who have not been following the 2nd forum topic which Stefan has posted the link to in the above post.

Here is the last update:

User id poynt99 has identified an error in my scope settings. I was using AC coupling in my scope probe settings when it should be set to DC coupling for correct power calculations. I'm not the only one that was doing this. Two other experimenters have said they were doing the same thing.
I've since re-tested everything with the scope on DC coupling and now see no real power gain or advantages in the circuit compared to when the scope was set to AC coupling. There is a big difference in results from AC to DC coupling as far as scope math is concerned.
It's also clear that a plug in watt meter cannot calculate a 90 degrees phase shift power correctly. So results using just that need to be questioned.

As for my generator tests, even though when my circuit was connected to the generator output and had no effect on the gen prime mover the energy source has been identified by user id TinMan. The power to my circuit was a transfer of power from the gens exciter field which coincided no effect back to the prime mover.

So two different things happening which made the results look good but now looks like there's no real power gain after all.
Maybe reactive power can be used to an advantage if you had a circuit that could use the return cap discharges (at 45 degree) and convert it to mechanical power (like I thought my generator was doing) or shore it in a battery. But none of this is happening if using single phase grid or gen. A 90 degrees phase shift for the single phase grid is like a short circuit and the wires just heat up.

That's where things are at this time and wishing you all the best in your experiments

Luc