Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

[MileHigh]

Let's now just do a very basic crunching of the numbers from the clip.  We are going to make two very basic assumptions.

The first assumption is that the voltage and current are perfectly in phase.  It's a light bulb load and the frequency is relatively low and that's what we see on the scope display so that's reasonable.

The second assumption is that we are going to multiply the peak values by one divided by the square root of two, which equals 0.7071.  That's what's done for a sine wave.  This will not be perfectly accurate but we will live with that.  If I can get the model of the scope off of the clip I will look it up.

So, 1900 volts peak-to-peak, divided by two equals 950 volts.
950 volts times 0.7071 gives you 671.7 volts RMS.

From looking at the clip, I am going to say the peak-to-peak current range is 0.95 amps.
0.95 amps divided by two gives you 0.475 amps.
0.475 amps times 0.7071 gives you 0.3359 amps RMS.

Therefore the approximate output power they seem to be measuring in the clip is 671.7 Volts RMS x 0.3359 Amps RMS.

The approximate output power is 226 watts.

The electric motor is drawing 655 watts of power.

Therefore the efficiency of the QEG is 226/655 x 100 = 34.5%.

Are they a bunch of fools or is this a cynical planned event to stoke up the activity in their suite of PayPal accounts?

MileHigh

[MileHigh]

Ari please resize your image to a much smaller size because otherwise it will mess up people's ability to read the thread.

Thanks,

MileHigh

[ariovaldo]

Ari please resize your image to a much smaller size because otherwise it will mess up people's ability to read the thread.

Thanks,

MileHigh

I still learning.......
Thanks

[stivep]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Knq_jIyWxhY&feature=youtu.be[/font]





Some  more of  secrets of Vasmus Free Energy Device part #9.
Free Energy is the energy that is Free of charge but energy must come from somewhere and be converted to usable form of energy
at minute 5:46 please note that 0.44 A current is clearly showing that voltage must be high  on the tungsten light bulbs.  Total power written in the light-bulbs divided  at 0.44A gives you voltage.
at 5:17 minute Vasmus is increasing  current on the ground wire using  potentiometer.
That clearly states about   push- pull electron pump mechanism with  time  delay.
The inertia of the mass particles  electrons  once activated has its own free flow mass delay.
Once activated electrons flow ( move) from the ground and loosely coupled     coil of load winding ( big coil) is dissipating that energy at "pull' interaction not allowing mass to stop as next demand for electrons flow is just continuation of inertia.
The low frequency carrier is modulated with high frequency picks at very top  of the amplitude presenting as DC of given with.
The amplitude of that square pics is much bigger as low amplitude carrier.


Modulation:
You could picture it as very narrow very high square picks of DC at frequency higher that the carrier.
The rising edge  and falling edge of such impulse is very short however for us the important is that  in the sloping down time there is at certain point the carrier of its very unique time base  amplitude level.
The picks are present only    - from  0 to maximum  of the carrier.


That is very much like Lithuania Experiment.







Wesley

[MileHigh]

It appears to me that the oscilloscope that they are using is an older-generation Tektronix DPO3054 model.  I am really out of touch with this stuff but I will assume the scope is somewhere between three and 10 years old.

I am going to assume that the scope they are using could display real-time RMS values for each scope channel.  I am also assuming that it may be able to do multiplication and averaging.

So in other words with RMS values, or with multiply + average, you could get a near-instant or instant reading for the average power going into the light bulb load.

If James has been working in tech for so long, and also very recently, how come he can't drive that scope like an expert and make his life easier?

For me the jury is out on this, and I give them the benefit of the doubt in the sense that they were very busy experimenting and they were not tinkering with the scope.

However, James could do exactly the same "paper napkin" calculations that I just did and see the truth staring him in the face.

The next logical step from the QEG team is a retraction of the over unity claim made in the recently posted clip and an apology.  If they don't do that then it will be the nail in the coffin for them with respect to their character, integrity,  and motivation.

MileHigh