Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

[memoryman]

The debate is over: on PESN
Stuart Campbell Mod • 2 hours ago

From Dave Starbruck...

Breaking News: Hot off the press!!!
I just spoke to Jamie and he mentioned that he has now achieved 3kW output, that's six times over unity!

We all know that Jamie is never wrong.

[TinselKoala]

The debate is over: on PESN
Stuart Campbell Mod • 2 hours ago

From Dave Starbruck...

Breaking News: Hot off the press!!!
I just spoke to Jamie and he mentioned that he has now achieved 3kW output, that's six times over unity!

We all know that Jamie is never wrong.

So what's the current excuse (no pun intended...) for the stone cold glaringly obvious fact that the device _still_ cannot be self-looped, to provide its own power to the drive motor?

Are there no microwave ovens that can be gutted for their transformers in Morocco?

[MarkE]

The debate is over: on PESN
Stuart Campbell Mod • 2 hours ago

From Dave Starbruck...

Breaking News: Hot off the press!!!
I just spoke to Jamie and he mentioned that he has now achieved 3kW output, that's six times over unity!

We all know that Jamie is never wrong.

The article was far more circumspect than Stuart's comments.  Sterling quoted someone from somewhere on Facebook who calls himself  John Gomez.  Sterling agreed with Gomez who recited the 8:1 ratio of the product of V_PEAK * I_PEAK to VA for sinusoidal voltage and current.  The math is trivial enough:  (2*2^0.5)² = 8. 

It never ceases to amaze me how people believe what they want.  A few days ago FTW put out the video Sterling included in the article where it is blatant that the best case output power was 250VA, only ~36% of the "Kill-a-Watt's" reported input power.  Jamie and Dave ecstatically declared that terrible result as over unity.  Now just a couple of days later people choose to believe that because Jamie is again claiming over unity and with no video or other evidence to see on what basis he makes that claim that somehow this time he is right.  These are the folks that fall into James Randi's infamous "believers" class.

[PCB]

In Jamie's recent report http://be-do.com/index.php/en/forum/qeg-news/393-qeg-morocco-overunity he says:

Interfacing to the real world brings up another item I've been wanting to mention to you guys: Judging from Witts latest (full version) video, the lack of any discernable change in resonance/sound/RPM etc. as he turns on lamp after lamp leads me to believe there is a constant impedance load on the output. In other words, I think the generator is operated at full power, full time, and the load is completely isolated from the output circuit (transformer or inductor as load), and all the power is pulled out of the secondary. This transformer/inductor load may also be a 3rd resonant (tuned) circuit on the generator side. And possibly, this may need to be set up first, before trying to tune in to the 'sweet spot' (original configuration).[/font][/size]

Correct me if I'm wrong but I thought the idea of the tank circuit on the output of the QEG was intended to do just that, that is place the unit under constant load. Correctly tuned (I assume around 400 hz) the tank circuit looks like a pure resistive load, but does not consume power. The last bit of what he says make no sense to me, as his light bulbs are a constant impedance load. If and when he adds a transformer it would replace the tank circuit and he will need to add capacitance. Oh why do I bother....

Its a bit frustrating in that we really have no idea what the present configuration looks like, and the purpose of the tank circuit seems to have been ignored completely, or at least that's how it appears to me. I think that perhaps Jamie has missed the significance of the tank circuit in the design.  This hardly feels open source, not unless you pay them $200 - $300K I guess.

[ACG]

In Jamie's recent report http://be-do.com/index.php/en/forum/qeg-news/393-qeg-morocco-overunity he says:


Correct me if I'm wrong but I thought the idea of the tank circuit on the output of the QEG was intended to do just that, that is place the unit under constant load. Correctly tuned (I assume around 400 hz) the tank circuit looks like a pure resistive load, but does not consume power. The last bit of what he says make no sense to me, as his light bulbs are a constant impedance load. If and when he adds a transformer it would replace the tank circuit and he will need to add capacitance. Oh why do I bother....

Its a bit frustrating in that we really have no idea what the present configuration looks like, and the purpose of the tank circuit seems to have been ignored completely, or at least that's how it appears to me. I think that perhaps Jamie has missed the significance of the tank circuit in the design.  This hardly feels open source, not unless you pay them $200 - $300K I guess.

Welcome to the QEG version of so called Open Source.  Where you get to pay 300 an hour for a skype consultation.  No update of instruction manual.  No clear diagram of test points.  Information sparsely leaked out on third party blogs, and no updates from the original source making the claim: FTW project domain and hopegirl wordpress.  Other than Got Resonance!! of course.