Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

Started by madddann, March 26, 2014, 09:42:27 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 36 Guests are viewing this topic.

Hope

"There are no legitimate scientific arguments that can explain how the QEG is supposed to allegedly work.  From what I can see so far, the QEG is doing exactly what it is supposed to do, and what it is expected to do - act like a very crappy generator."


That is a quote


Only?? I feel this QEG is working and as a scalar wave generator.  And as long as they try to tune it using traditional methods (made for EMF) they will NOT gain much ground.  But let us look at it in scalar definitions, then we can see what is causing the now present energy.   Tom Bearden should be contacted and sourced to find similarities between the QEG using the known scalar producing theory.   You may just move on to any remark you wish and ignore this input.  But that will not change the facts that it can not be explained using EMF formulas.


Tesla was fascinated by the bi-filar coils ability to convert massive amounts of EMF into scalar waves which then produced heat.  That was caused by the energies flowing in opposite directions and causing EMF friction.  So we can make heat,  that does not solve for creating energy.  I think to vortexes flowing in opposite directions will be the opposite action of the bi-filar coil.   We get heat from making the emf moving in opposite directions, of course the will attract to each other and friction makes the heat.  Lets make scalar waves repel each other and then make energy.

Hope

Quote from: TinselKoala on May 24, 2014, 02:33:10 PM
But... but.... hundreds of Engineers! Twenty years of experience at ShopVac! Inventions!


Even the 2kV peak-to-peak values they have shown can teach them a powerful lesson. One that only needs to be experienced once. One that _can_ only be experienced... once.

My MOT-DC SGTC coil working has around 2 kV input to the primary tank (from a microwave oven transformer), and something like 170 nF of capacitance charged to that voltage. It scares the crap out of me. One may look at my videos to see how carefully I handle that with layout and procedure, even with bleeders on the cap bank.

I almost died one afternoon. I had charged up a big 30 kV rated Maxwell pulse capacitor, 0.3 uF IIRC, using a Bonetti machine, in preparation for a wire explosion shot. The system was supposed to fire automatically when the main airgap overvolted... but it didn't. So I took my "jesus pole" and shorted the airgap manually... and the capacitor exploded.  I estimate that the cap probably charged to over 60 kV. I was wearing a full face guard and earmuffs, a good thing because shards of the capacitor case went flying, oil splattered everywhere, and the main capacitor remnant (an oil-filled stack of paper and copper foil) caught on fire. This is a physically large capacitor, about 2 feet long and six by four inches rectangular, with one terminal on each long end.  I put out the fire and was cleaning up, went to put a safety short across the terminals of the remnant... and accidentally brushed against some of the foil hanging out. There was enough charge left in the shattered capacitor to knock me across the room and leave me unconscious. Probably only for a few seconds. This was a good thing because I was completely alone in the lab (Bldg 29, Alameda NAS) with no one around, literally for miles.


What parallels I see in what happened at 911 to cars nowhere near the collapse zone.  They caught fire and flipped from some strange whip like snap of scalar waves.  You scholars (scalars)+ (lol) of Tesla have read of the odd effects huge discharges have had on close yet not seemingly to close objects.  How many similarities do we need to list before we see how scalar waves could be causing all this phenomena.   I must have my scalar blind filter glasses on,  can anyone else see the parallels?
 

MarkE

Quote from: Hope on May 27, 2014, 04:25:23 AM
"There are no legitimate scientific arguments that can explain how the QEG is supposed to allegedly work.  From what I can see so far, the QEG is doing exactly what it is supposed to do, and what it is expected to do - act like a very crappy generator."


That is a quote


Only?? I feel this QEG is working and as a scalar wave generator. 
You can feel whatever you like.  The evidence presented to date is in line with MileHigh's assessment.
Quote
And as long as they try to tune it using traditional methods (made for EMF) they will NOT gain much ground.  But let us look at it in scalar definitions, then we can see what is causing the now present energy.
The energy out evidenced is a small fraction of the input energy.
Quote

Tom Bearden should be contacted and sourced to find similarities between the QEG using the known scalar producing theory.   You may just move on to any remark you wish and ignore this input.  But that will not change the facts that it can not be explained using EMF formulas.[/font]
What behavior of the QEG do you think  has not been explained adequately by existing theory?
Quote


Tesla was fascinated by the bi-filar coils ability to convert massive amounts of EMF into scalar waves which then produced heat.  That was caused by the energies flowing in opposite directions and causing EMF friction.  So we can make heat,  that does not solve for creating energy.  I think to vortexes flowing in opposite directions will be the opposite action of the bi-filar coil.   We get heat from making the emf moving in opposite directions, of course the will attract to each other and friction makes the heat.  Lets make scalar waves repel each other and then make energy.
In circuits, we dissipate energy as heat when we: drive currents through resistances, including eddy currents, or we drive magnetics around their hysteresis loops. 

A bifilar coil forms a tightly coupled winding.  Particularly when wound on a core the mutual inductance is many times the leakage inductance.  In exchange, the mutal capacitance is much higher than for other winding structures.  While bifilar windings are useful for many applications, there is nothing mysterious or magic about them.

Shanti

I'm always puzzled what people always tell Tesla said or did...

QuoteTesla was fascinated by the bi-filar coils ability to convert massive amounts of EMF into scalar waves which then produced heat.

Please quote, the original article from Tesla, where he said anything like that. If you are not able to, then better not just proclaim things about Tesla, for which you do not have any support to back it.

As has been said, the famous bifilar coils are nothing fancy. Tesla mentions them as a possibility to increase the capacitance in the coil, which is useful for certain applications.

And BTW: AS read from all the articles from Tesla, it doesn't seem he has made a lot of use of them...

E.g. in a typical Tesla Coil or Magnifier you actually want exactly the opposite. There you have to get rid of as much capacitance in your coil as possible. That's why Tesla even describes in his CS-Notes how already the insulation of the wire unnecessarily increases the capacity in the coil, and that it's advantageous  to take bare wire with air in between the windings.
There it's a hard trade-off between more inductance, and more capacitance you get by winding them closer. But I get offtopic...


@Tinsel:
It's also a bit offtopic, OK, but I could well believe the reason for the spark going around the water drop is, that the water surface is highly ionized.

Johan_1955

Quote from: Hope on May 27, 2014, 04:41:26 AM

What parallels I see in what happened at 911 to cars nowhere near the collapse zone.  They caught fire and flipped from some strange whip like snap of scalar waves.  You scholars (scalars)+ (lol) of Tesla have read of the odd effects huge discharges have had on close yet not seemingly to close objects.  How many similarities do we need to list before we see how scalar waves could be causing all this phenomena.   I must have my scalar blind filter glasses on,  can anyone else see the parallels?


Hi Hope,
Good, and in only a few minutes directly 2 times reacted with a firm "no", from ........ ?
Maybe the Vars are a magnet for Scalar, make order, VARS and order again, look also at EF.
Regards, Johan