Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

[dieter]

So what are you doing on this forum then?

[Cap-Z-ro]

So what are you doing on this forum then?

I believe they call it mental masturbation.

Regards...

[sarkeizen]

So what are you doing on this forum then?

This is pretty well documented.  At one time I would follow some of the postings of Philip Hardcastle who turned out to be something of an enormous fraud...and even more enormous asshole.

I sort of kept hanging around after that.

[Pirate88179]

Unlikely.  Nobody in any OU community anywhere has contributed anything about their field to the body of scientific work ever.

Why?  Because the only thing an OU cheerleader can contribute is that OU is clearly and unambiguously real.  Every other outcome can be summed up as:

i) You thought it was real but you were mistaken.
ii) You realize it isn't real.

Both of these are already well documented.

Very sad, but too true.

How many times have we heard this?

Well, it worked overunity until I took it apart, and now it no longer works.
My breakthrough was so advanced, that the MIB came to my house and threatened me, so , I took it apart.
I only need another $100,000 dollars to get it working again.
I don't have a working model, but I can sell you the plans for one for $25,000.

And on, and on.

HopelessGirl fits this profile to a T.

Bill

[sarkeizen]

Well, it worked overunity until I took it apart, and now it no longer works.
My breakthrough was so advanced, that the MIB came to my house and threatened me, so , I took it apart.
I only need another $100,000 dollars to get it working again.
I don't have a working model, but I can sell you the plans for one for $25,000.

The most common one for me is "it works in this small scale, so all I need is money to make a big one".

IMHO as someone who knows a thing or two about math.  The probability of making a small error is big and easily climbs to enormous the more variables you add.  So when you observe almost any unexpected effect on the small scale it is far more likely to be an error than anything else.   Even when you rigorously control things.   This isn't just in crazy places like this.  Science magazines publish nonsense and even journals.   Ioannidis is famous for a paper entitled - most published research is false.   Where they looked at the low rate of replication of research published in journals.