Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

[Cap-Z-ro]

Wood all this closed loop arse kissing be considered overunity or just under the belt friction sparks ?

Guess this is they only venue they have left now that Chris put them on ignore and Ken keeps giving them a good arse kicking every time they take a run at him in his thread.

Might be advisable for them to wear safety goggles in case of projectile laden farts.

Great comedy tho.

Regards...

[MarkE]

You watched the whole thing?  You poor bastard!  Thank you for sacrificing yourself for the good of others.  That was a very self-less act on your part and I, for one, really appreciate that.

Bill

PS  Armed insurrections are always called for when scientific laws and common sense stop your flow of income.  In other words...the last resort.

The narrative at the end was very disjoint.  The speaker kept talking about some "freedom movement" and that its members needed to "prepare for the worst", and how nonviolece would not work.  Maybe the plan is to beat the QEG into submission.

[MarkE]

Some more links:

Big new tech blurb on Be-Do including new pdf schematics:

http://be-do.com/index.php/en/forum/qeg-news/640-present-stage-of-qeg-development-latest-findings-call-for-experiments

They claim that they are 80% efficient now.  If they got that far then they've gone from having a deplorable transformer to a mediocre one.  In the meantime there are two new levels of resonance they say they need to achieve:  a piezoelectric one, and then the magic one that is supposed to actually pull energy out of the environment.  They want others to chase those rainbows.

Related non-YouTube video clip with tech discussion with Jamie, Tivom Rivers, and Naima:

http://fixtheworld.podbean.com/e/episode-7-qeg-synopsis-latest-findings-call-for-experiments/?token=a7067a7fc890db09fccbded530659e86

The video talks about the new goal post position and their random ideas on how they will supposedly eventually do what they claimed they had done a year and a half ago.

[padova]

We used a 20MHz signal/function generator to drive the audio amp with a 50% duty cycle square wave signal, between about 47Hz and 2,000Hz (2kHz). We then connected the scope across the primary windings (also wired in series) and observed the core's response to the input signals. 

That's just a 'smoking gun' moment or call it another brick in the wall.

  You don't scan for resonance with a square wave.  It's a major faux pas.

Hi,

Are you really sure about that . 

[MarkE]

I don't think I have the energy to discuss their big tech discussion.  In a nutshell they are still talking about the three resonances and adding some more coils on top of the existing coils.  That's all a road to nowhere.

Just one I want to discuss:

In the Be-Do posting they talk about trying to find the mechanical resonance of the core and they state this:

<<<
A 600 Watt automotive audio power amplifier (with 12VDC switching power supply) was employed this time, to drive the low impedance (approx. 1.5Ω) secondaries, wired in series. We used a 20MHz signal/function generator to drive the audio amp with a 50% duty cycle square wave signal, between about 47Hz and 2,000Hz (2kHz). We then connected the scope across the primary windings (also wired in series) and observed the core's response to the input signals.  The output level from the signal generator was set to about 18V, just below clipping of the signal, and the rotor was held stationary, in alignment with 2 of the pole pieces (for maximum inductance) – See schematic here:
>>>

That's just a 'smoking gun' moment or call it another brick in the wall.

I am not even going to discuss if their approach to the test itself makes sense but I am not feeling it.  You don't scan for resonance with a square wave.  It's a major faux pas.  It's like really _really_ bad to state that.  That shows that Jamie and Tivon don't know what they are doing.  So it's still just as depressing as usual.

The high harmonic content of a square wave is a disadvantage, but it is not a show stopper.