Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

[SoManyWires]

First of all...it is JB Weld, not gb weld.  Second of all, what do you have against JB Weld?  It actually works and is not a scam like the QEG folks.

Misinformation?

HopeGirl takes the cake (not implying anything about her weight here) for that title.

I have never posted any misinformation anywhere at any time.  If you think otherwise, please show me where you think I have done so.  Please use actual quotes and dates when you do this.

Thank you.

Bill

PS  If you were not referring to me, then I apologize.  I have been touting the greatness of JB Weld but, that was only in response to Joel who likes to throw things away and buy new instead of fixing them, and thinks he is smart by doing so.

oops, spelling error.

JB Weld.

oh no appology needed, i could not direct my criticism towards you good sir.

you are a good person, rather than use your skills to take advantage of people, you choose to help guide them, and you've been doing so on here without asking for a dime.
with your conscience very much intact, you sleep nights knowing you are not a bad person.
making as a good role model, you give the troubled youth a better direction to venture toward.
they too can develop their own conscience towards others outside of their present narrow scope.
and you are doing a much better job of it than i ever could. please continue! =)

all the best

[Pirate88179]

oops, spelling error.

JB Weld.

oh no appology needed, i could not direct my criticism towards you good sir.

you are a good person, rather than use your skills to take advantage of people, you choose to help guide them, and you've been doing so on here without asking for a dime.
with your conscience very much intact, you sleep nights knowing you are not a bad person.
making as a good role model, you give the troubled youth a better direction to venture toward.
they too can develop their own conscience towards others outside of their present narrow scope.
and you are doing a much better job of it than i ever could. please continue! =)

all the best

Well thank you but, I don't deserve that...but thanks just the same.  I do apologize for the fact that I had misread your posting.  I had thought that might be the case which is why I added my disclaimer at the end of my post.

You have my sincere apology and my thanks.

Bill

[joel321]

Did anyone noticed how MarkE just ignored anything having to do with ALIENS? What do we know so far?

– sound waves can bend light.
--Neutrinos can pass through the most human known dense objects (even through diamonds?).
--The black holes can disintegrate all matter.
--the universe came from a "big bang".
--A magnetic field needs an unbalance of magnetic fields to attract each other.
--our neurons in the brain are driven by electric pulses that carry a code (who can comprehend this?).
--ETC....ETC...

Based on all of this one can gather FROM every angle EVOLUTINARY, LIFE CHANGING, thoughts to move on forward 'cause we are on a path to LEARN. Just like time NEVER stops, the learning NEVER stops = there are billions of things yet to be discovered THE END OF STOPPING LEARNING IS WHEN MarkE CAN CREATE A GALAXY of his own! While he cannot, he CAN'T be the truth teller of a dynamic universe.

One just needs to look at the past and present to understand how the puzzle comes together with out ANYONE having to tell you how the whole puzzle comes together. And this is NOT and easy thing to do in a modern world where the young/old are manipulated by the media and the repetitiveness till you get tired of fighting for what is truth.

Now to this point, with very expensive equipment, do you think, MarkE, that Neutrinos are the ULTIMATE sub atomic particle that is out there? Or are there even more in the lower of the ladder under the neutrino? Elementary stuff in the thinking...hard for those that like to SEE to believe.

To put it in perceptive, we are still discovering deep ocean creatures/animals from the deep see in the year 2015, now multiply the abyss of the ocean with the abyss with the universe....lol....cop>+ all around an exploding star.

[stivep]

Did anyone noticed how MarkE...

All I know about  MarkE is that he  has a lot of posts here.
He might be smart  guy.
I do not know, can not tell.

– sound waves can bend light.

Sound are waves of higher and lower densities in the air.
You never bend light.
You just change path of photon.the closest term  more o less correct will be  "deflect"  ( change of direction by interposing something; turn aside from a straight course.)

--Neutrinos can pass through the most human known dense objects (even through diamonds?).

nothing special. you will lose vacuum in high  vacuum chamber due to porosity of material ( metal used )
We  are just  one big vacuum.
think about size of an atom.
nucleus:
proton/ space/ neutron/ space/.....
ocasionally electrons but nor really electrons... called  for easy explanation sometime electrons as they have the same  or close mass to electron...
they are antimatter, or anti particles originated inside nucleus due to nucleus instability (" unhappiness" ) manifestation.
characteristic to isotopes.
Positron is antimatter in properties  close to  electron but in  opposite sign.
Positron originates from nucleus.




Cloud around nucleus :




in first orbit we  have 2 electrons
in second orbit we have 8 electrons
in third  orbit we have 18 electrons
in the fourth  orbit we have  32 electrons




orbits are as fallowed:
starting from nucleus ( the closest ) is K, than L, M, N, and so on as alphabet goes



between nucleus and first orbit K:
space/ space/ space/ space/  electron/........


between first orbit K and second orbit  L......
again  space space space space . more of the space..... another  electron cloud...
many atoms have  only few electrons.


and
between first orbit L and second orbit  M......
again  space space space space . more of the space..... another  electron cloud...


and so on......That space is vacuum.
We are made mostly  from vacuum, so is diamond  .. only  little more dense that  is all..
Crystals are made form atoms as well.
Atoms are held together in crystals by atomic bonding

--The black holes can disintegrate all matter.

yes however  that is theoretical assumption

[/size]
--the universe came from a "big bang".

yes however  that is theoretical assumption and drifts with time, to new[/size] however  that is theoretical assumption.[/size]

--A magnetic field needs an unbalance of magnetic fields to attract each other.

gush...
cow needs the cow out of control to be attractive to the cow......... kind of weird isn't it?
I would explain it different..
spin of electron is origin of magnetic field:

An electron spin s = 1/2 is an intrinsic property of electrons. ... atoms directed through an inhomogeneous magnetic field would be forced into two beams
Electrons have intrinsic angular momentum characterized by quantum number 1/2.
In the pattern of other quantized angular momenta, this gives total angular momentum
z-component of the angular momentum.
causes an energy splitting because of the magnetic moment of the electron
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/spin.html.

I have made explanation    but in Russian language while I tried  to correct Akula
some time ago.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KxEqiS5H1DE

--our neurons in the brain are driven by electric pulses that carry a code (who can comprehend this?).
--ETC....ETC...
Man I'm not good in biology or bio-processes.I know as much as you  there.We are operating our processes  with electrical impulses mostly .
But  yes that is general knowledge in it.

One just needs to look at the past and present to understand how the puzzle comes together with out ANYONE having to tell you how the whole puzzle comes together. And this is NOT and easy thing to do in a modern world where the young/old are manipulated by the media and the repetitiveness till you get tired of fighting for what is truth.

Now to this point, with very expensive equipment, do you think, MarkE, that Neutrinos are the ULTIMATE sub atomic particle that is out there? Or are there even more in the lower of the ladder under the neutrino? Elementary stuff in the thinking...hard for those that like to SEE to believe.

I think we know nothing or  that what we know is nothing comparing to what we will know.
moore's law technology progression:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore%27s_law

[/size]To put it in perceptive, we are still discovering deep ocean creatures/animals from the deep see in the year 2015, now multiply the abyss of the ocean with the abyss with the universe....lol....cop>+ all around an exploding star.

We are here  because we need to  know more and eventually benefit from that
.








Wesley

[joel321]

All I know about  MarkE is that he  has a lot of posts here.
He might be smart  guy.
I do not know, can not tell.

If you understand how social humans work, there are a lot that follow the "group"...meaning even if he may be correct in a lot of things as a lone individual, he will still follow the crowd as to not stand out or to not get singled out. This happens to the very intelligent people too. It goes all the way up as serious as loosing their jobs for going against the NORM. This is clear and has been studied/seen by psychologist all over the world. There have even been scenarios where a guy is trying to commit suicide trying to jump from 30 stories high and spectators gather down below. After a couple of hours, there will be people getting frustrated and just scream out "just jump already"....and since people are influenced by others, there will be eventually a lot of people screaming the guy to jump...and then there will be others to tell them screamers to shut up and then there will be a debate between the two groups...if the guy jumps...the people that where screaming to jump feel like it was the right thing to say. If the guy does not jump, they feel like it was the right thing to do...it's all psychological and it has been studied very deep...the guys whom got frustrated are like the leeches that suck your blood that come out when you get to live with them. Lol This is another interesting psychological thing. In relationships, they don't know each other very well UNTIL they live together. They may be going out for 5 years, but when they move in together, they see the other side of the person....I may be writing too much but this has already been studied and well understood. So having said that, the only way to judge MarkE is if you move in with him in his house for a couple of years lol...

Sound are waves of higher and lower densities in the air.
You never bend light.
You just change path of photon.the closest term  more o less correct will be  "deflect"  ( change of direction by interposing something; turn aside from a straight course.)

It does not matter how you say it, LIGHT MUST CURVE!. So you are telling me that light is a perfect straight line through all matter? Even water bends light...even a mirror reflects light. Changing the "path" of a photon is bending. Bending a photon itself is some other type of phenomena. But maybe I don't understand light that much. How do you explain fiber optic cable bending? I mean photons bouncing around the cable but still bending? LIGHT BENDS...will it go straight in a black hole?

We are made mostly  from vacuum

Yeah I don't want to get that far down the rabbit hole 'cause, to be honest, that is just throwing darts in the dark....or to put it in another way, that is wayyyyy down (or top) the ladder. What I would like to talk about most is what is closest to the KNOW understanding of humans in the present. From what I can understand the neutrinos pass through all KNOWN matter. BUT WHAT I CAN PREDICT IS THAT THEY REFLECT TOO just like there is a mirror to a laser light. This reflection = curving. Which means 100% light curves OR REFLECTS in a controlled manner.

yes however  that is theoretical assumption

Well yeah that is theoretical but the smartest people in the world believe in them. And, to be honest, they may be correct but, to me, a black hole could only seem black because they believe the black is nothing there where it could just be another type of star that is outside the light spectrum of our eye sight. It has been proven that an mantis shrimp sees more colors than a human eye which, AHEM< we are judging the universe based on "light" colors only...can you imagine a mantis human shrimp looking up in the sky through a telescope?

yes however  that is theoretical assumption and drifts with time, to new[/size] however  that is theoretical assumption.[/size]

Yes I know there are like seven theories regarding "the big bang" but MOST don't know those theories. But for the general public, THE BIG BANG is well accepted enough to be taught in schools. ALTHOUGH, I don't know how that helps one in the future to understand? How about teaching the school kids about multiverses or invisibility? All of that dark matter must have STRAIGHT RAYS OF LIGHT GOING THROUGH IT EEHHH! Now, what is making those photons look dark?

cow needs the cow out of control to be attractive to the cow......... kind of weird isn't it?
 I would explain it different..
spin of electron is origin of magnetic field:

It is 100% fact that a magnet is not 100% balanced...or should I say, the magnetic fields correlated to the N and S are not 100% balanced...you can call those "legs". Can you think of a magnet as ATOM and the atoms magnetic fields? Same thing, just understand that a magnet has two nucleus.

We are here  because we need to  know more and eventually benefit from that

All I am saying is that the ROOT of "renewable energy" comes from the big bang and THAT we have not discovered 100% all anymals in the abyss of the oceans to TRY TO GET FAT HEADED and proclaim that "we" understand the edge of the universe! Like WTF! How can someone claim 10000000% that there are no aliens when they don't know 1000000000% all the animals in the world in the oceans and this includes the land too. HOW? That does not make sense....One single person telling me that there are no aliens in this world while they don't know 100% all animals in this world? Lol I don't think you know how DEEP I'm thinking