Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

[Ben57]

Why not use knowledge and time to think of something that hasn't been tried and post your suggestion or ideas.
If you can't come up with something,  then why would you criticize those who try?...  seriously, give this some thought to see how it helps.

The day we work together will be the day of change.

Hi Luc
I fully agree with you, working together will be the way of change from a global 'virtual hobbyist' to a 'virtual prof'.
However we need both the 'critics' and the 'creatives' in a winning team. The purpose of a 'peer review' in regular science is just to have a critical reviewer which weeds out the errors made, before something is being published.
Creative minds tent to develop a tunnel vision while working on an interesting development and sometimes do not see that they are missing something. Discussions between the 'creatives' and 'critics' very often end in ego driven arguments. Sometimes someone gets banned from a discussion for being critical.

'critics' and 'creatives' are like yin and yang; north and south; plus and minus.....etc
Best regards,
Ben

[lancaIV]

Well said Luc
Check out post 389
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/16584-analysis-witts-generator-13.html
It ain't over yet.

                                  to Ufopolitics #363



http://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?compact=false&ST=advanced&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&PA=kango+iida

from epo.org inventor Kango Iida :
PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To obtain a multipole conversion device and a conversion method by which the efficiency of more than 95% for converting a mechanical energy into an electrical energy can be realized in comparison with the efficiency of less then 50% with a conventional constitution, one apparatus can function both as a generator and a motor, a speed-up device is eliminated and the manufacturing cost can be reduced easily. SOLUTION: Magnets 23 are provided on both the sides of cores 21 on which coils 22 are wound so as to have the polarities of the magnets 23 same as the polarities N1-N2 and S1-S2. The respective cores of N1, N2, S1 and S2 are extended, N1, N2, S1 and S2 are used as one set and a multipole construction consisting of poles integer times of the one set is provided. A core 24 which has polarities corresponding to the polarities of the multipole construction and has no poles is provided inside or outside the multipole construction. A motor magnet wires are applied to the core 24 without poles to form coils 29 and commentators and brushes are attached to the coils 29 and a DC voltage is applied.


My question : ....... in comparision with the efficiency of less then 50% with a conventional constitution,......
Mister Iida scientifical standart,japanese science standart ? Mental error ?



http://www.geminielectricmotor.com/What%60s%20NEW.htm
With the cost of oil increasing the urgency to find an alternate source of reliable, sustainable electric energy has never been more important. With dire weather and global warming, green house effects, already  being felt in most parts of the world, a few inventors, and some  electrical engineers are asking was the original electric motor design  the right one ? After millions of dollars, and millions of man hours by electrical engineers, the basic design has changed very little. In the conventional electric motor only the outside magnetic poles are used, resulting in 50% of the magnetic flux created being wasted. The  Gemini Electric Motor effectively uses both inner and outer magnetic poles, resulting in 100% of the magnetic flux being used to create  torque or generate an electric current.


"... resulting in 50% of the magnetic flux created being waste.."


Waste energy recuperation source No.1

         

          resonance : how many different kinds ?
http://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?compact=false&ST=advanced&IN=dinnan&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&PA=meta+c

[verpies]

I am going to enter rarely visited waters...
The example circuit to analyze the problem is trivial - it's just an ideal inductor shorted by an ideal wire.

The formula for your inductance as a function of time:
L(t) =  (sin(omega * t) +2)     [inductance varies between 1 and 3 Henries]   Note - I am avoiding a divide-by-zero problem

Let's define the initial conditions and use something simple to illustrate the problem:  When the inductance is 3 Henries, say the current is 5 amps.   That means you have 37.5 joules stored in the coil under these conditions.

Everything is ideal, so no energy is lost.   We just need to solve for the current as a function of inductance.  Since the inductance also varies with time, you effectively are also solving for the current as a function of time.   The voltage across the coil is always zero, and that may help us to simplify things.

Let's take a peek at how things look when the inductance is 1 henry.  You still have to have 37.5 joules stored in the inductor therefore the current has to be:

E = 1/2 L I^2
I^2 = 2E/L
I = sqrt(2E/L)
Therefore when L = 1 Henry,  i = 8.66 amps.

Now let's complicate it slightly.
In your example above the cause of the inductance change was not given.  It was just abstractly assumed to happen somehow.
In the following exercise, I will attempt to give it a real cause.

Let's propose that the change in inductance is caused by an ideal ferrite core at rest being attracted into that ideal air coil from far away, in absence of gravity, so that its inductance changes from 1H (when the core is away) to 3H (when the core is inside the coil).  See the graph below for a realistic relationship between the core's distance and the inductance of the coil (taken from a real linear motor).
According to your calculations when the core is away the current flowing through the coil is 8.66A and when the core is inside the coil the current flowing in it is 5A. ...Fine.

Let's assume that the acceleration of the core into the coil from 10cm away takes 100ms and when the core reaches the middle of the coil its speed is 1m/s.
10µs before the core reaches the middle of the coil, a switch is opened and all of the energy stored in the coil (37.5J) is discharged into an ideal capacitor in 10µs.  Now all of the energy is in the capacitor and no current flows through the coil. At this point the capacitor is disconnected from the coil (so it cannot recharge the coil back) and the massive core continues on its path with constant velocity because now the coil is opened and has no current flowing in it, thus it cannot exert any force on the departing core.

But wait!  Now, we have all of our input energy recovered in a capacitor but the departing core has significant remaining kinetic energy 

[Vortex1]

TK said:

Of course, now that they are selling their time for 300 dollars an hour plus expenses as consultants to help _others_ get their units up and running.... when they can't get their own units "running"...  they are selling something they don't have (the knowledge to do what they claim to teach) therefore: conscious fraud.

Bob Dylan wrote:

"Do you take me for such a fool to think I'd make contact
With the one who tries to hide what he don't know to begin with?"

Regarding their consulting, you could change "hide" to "sell"
[/color]

[verpies]

One of the things that I think could help is a basic power analyzer that is affordable and reasonably accurate:  Say +/-5%.  I think that is a doable project that could be done open source so that for less than $200. and perhaps as little as $100. people working with electrical machines could quickly assess actual input and output power precisely enough to know if they have something with real promise, or are just misleading themselves with poor power measurements.

Something like this?