Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

[SeaMonkey]

Those who've never been in the near vicinity of any
of these mysterious devices do indeed have a very
difficult time accepting that they may in fact be
possible.

They do exist and have been utilized by certain select
programs/agencies for a considerable time - several
decades.

What is essential to understand with respect to the
QEG is the difference between the resonance frequency
and the power output frequency.  The rotor achieves
four magnetic reversals across the output coils for each
revolution.  It would be very helpful to see a dual trace
oscilloscope display of both the resonant waveform and
the output waveform to make frequency and phase
measurements.

With the QEG even the slightest tiny bit of residual
magnetism is all that is necessary to begin the excitation
of the resonant components which will very quickly build
up to large magnitude oscillations at the proper rotational
frequency.  The resultant magnetic field is incredibly strong
at resonance and it should not saturate the material which
comprises the magnetic circuit or path.

Parametric amplification?

[verpies]

4.) If the applied voltage is instantly removed from a coil of wire, then what happens?
Does the magnetic field merely drop to zero?
or
Does it oscillate between positive and negative polarities until it drops to zero?

Neither.
This scenario represents an RL circuit.  In such circuit, the magnetic flux generated by the coil gradually decreases to zero (or never decreases if the coil is superconducting).
Oscillations occur only when this coil is combined with a capacitance.

[Rfacts]

MileHigh:
I've watched all of the videos that I found related to the QEG and think the capacitor comment I was referring to was made in the video that vidbid posted above or the recent PESN QED interview video.  I spot checked these two videos where I thought the comment was made but did not find it, these 2 videos alone are about 2 1/2 hours long, I'll let you know if I come across it again.  I should have been more clear about the context in which that comment was stated.  From what I recall the comment about trying so many capacitor combinations was due to the limited number of film capacitor values at the 2000V rating, the series parallel combinations that were used, testing at different resonance frequencies to find the optimum output power and attempting to run at 50 and 60Hz to avoid having to use an output inverter.  Some transcribed Q&A sessions with James Robitaille were posted on the FTW QED Forum web site, this is a question and answer that refers to the QEG as a variable frequency generator:

Q: What is responsible for that freq? Differently asked: what should/could be changed in the design if we want to change that freq?
A: Briefly, there are 2 main components in setting the frequency: the electrical resonance and the mechanical resonance. This is actually a variable frequency generator so changing capacitor value changes electrical resonant frequency and rpm where resonance is reached.

Question for you.  Is a film capacitor typically required for this type of application, if so why?  It has been stated that the QEG primary and secondary are operating at 400Hz and that the primary capacitance needs to withstand 24kV, so in final circuit 12 capacitors rated at 2kV each are connected in series.  In the FTW QEG User Manual the capacitance value in the schematic is listed as 1.5uF 2kV each for a total of 0.125uF but listed in the parts list and description in the same manual as 2.5uF 2kV for total capacitance of 0.208uF.  I'm primarily asking in reference to replicating the QEG high voltage effect because 1nF and 10nF 30kV ceramic capacitors that can be connected in parallel and series combination for the same total capacitance and higher voltage rating can be found on eBay for a much lower cost.

[markdansie]

" It's not up to us to prove the technology works, we gave it away, open sourced it, and it's up to the engineers and the people to make it work." HopeGirl


I rest my case. For those of you who are spending a lot of money and time on this replication, please bear in mind the plans given to you for free do not work as claimed. I wish you all the best.


Kind Regards
Mark Dansie

[wattsup]

@woopy

Saw your youtube. Good experiment. Maybe try rotating your disk so it only cuts one end of the u cores and not both. I think you are just creating cancellation and that's why you see no difference on the feed specs.

Also, maybe consider trying this. With the C cores facing each other, put one or more magnets in between one end where both will meet and hold together to produce a O shape with a slit open for the rotor to turn between. hehehe That would be a good trial just to push more out-of-the-box.

@gotoluc

I left you a post at OUR, Maybe take a read and let me know.

Listen, this QEG is doing what? Producing volts. Just use a Tesla coil and it will do the same thing.

Basically if this QEG requires anything that will rotate, what do you think will be the outcome. Moving a piece of iron to produce an electromagnet, and then we all wonder why it seizes.

My gut tells me this is a group of people that embarked on a build, went a little overboard on costs, did not get the results and now they are trying to recoup as much as they can by convincing others to chime in with some money to get "starter plans" of something that does not work. Chime in on what?

I was in a Quebec group of motor/generator/gearing guys and we spent 250K to find out certain methods won't work. hahaha. We did not afterwards go public to offer to sell the tech slating it as "for further development".

My own hint when planning to make big builds, first establish a small R&D business. I have three companies, two that are in my specialty of water treatment and the third I use only for R&D. All my R&D expenses go into that company and the capital just grows and grows. If I close the company tomorrow, I can get 50% of the capital as personal tax credit. If I use the company to make a big profit on something (it has to be big), then after paying a corporate tax of 20% I can then take all the capital I put in right back into my pocket non-taxable. One day, if I ever decide to actually pay myself a salary for R&D, the Canadian Government will pay me back 50% of that. hahaha

The QEG will work miracles when one day, we find a way to make that piece of iron approach the MOT then disappear. But that is not possible in the foreseeable future. The only other way I can think of is explained at OUR.

The solution I am proposing to you at OUR is to try and push the idea into a more realistic and especially a more out-of-the-box approach. Imagine a huge core having a coil of 20-40 Henries or so, just moving the plate in and out not even at a very fast speed should produce some good output that could be capped and then really be usable. Is it OU, don't know but it has a much better shot at working then turning a wheel.

But as soon as you start playing the rotation game, you are stuck with the progressive rise, peak, progressive fall and during all that time, you are setting up the electromagnetic demise because the approaching iron generates the jail it then gets caught in.

The other main problem with your testing versus QEG is leverage. Since your I core is at the outside of a rotating system, a drag of 1 between the I and E core will be transfered to the motor as a drag of 10 (as an example). So just a slight seizing at the outer end of the rotation will produce great drag force on the motor. That's leverage and the way it is set-up, it is working against you.

The QEG on the other hand has the rotor plates close to the shaft so the reverse leverage from drag will still be felt but not as much as your system. It will however suffer from lower rotor plate speed across the stator plates. This is because at a fixed RPM, a large diameter wheel will provide more end speed then a smaller diameter wheel. So the QEG only had one more option, increase rotation speed, but as you increase rotation speed, if you do not increase the applied horsepower as well, you now will have much less torque. So this game has been played and played and played for so many years and people forget to consider all the chips on the table before placing a bet. They think they are doing something new, spend the bucks, then cry to mommy when it all goes south.

But whatever you do man, I am always loving every minute of it because I appreciate your genuine effort to help the world, like many of us here. Pure intent is what you exude when you are authentic. And, it does not hurt to have friends that check your back. hahaha

The pick up coil wants to see change. Change occurs when the iron plate approaches and it also occurs when it backs away. The small instant of no movement is what I would be interested in that you cannot produce when rotating. hehehe

wattsup